Elsie Oakensen talks about her UFO encounter and alien abduction experie...

Rayna Ryan talks about her alien encounter experiences, 1983 / 1989

From what is said it sounds that Rayna lapsed into an altered state during which she 'saw' -and it WOULD seem real to her- the aliens before going back to stir her beans. The second incident is clearly sleep paralysis.

Japanese case of an alien abductee's life changing UFO encounter, 1979

You Never Asked...

...but I will explain why I am not doing long, original post any more.

Simple:

1. I got fed up with people stealing and using my original research and giving no credit just taking a lot of credit or their research  stealing.

2. After 2 decades I just cannot be bothered posting and getting absolutely no reactions or comments. Enough people read this blog but no one comments. No one is interested enough to but any of my books or even support the ongoing work.

That covers it.

You get what you get and I hope what you get here does keep you entertained and educates you.

A pity that the so called new elite on You Tube do not actually bother doing any checking and are quite willing to state they know nothing of CE3K/AE cases but jump head first into the  debunking and silly comments.

"It was science fiction coming to live" ~ Reconstruction of Kelly Cahill...

“The Sandeman Entity: The Reg Chapman/Winter Hill Case” | Paranormal Sto...

“Woman claims ‘dissected like frogs’ on UFO” - Sandy Larson’s alien abdu...

What If Alien Life Were Silicon-Based?

Valerie Benson talks about her multiple 1971 UFO encounters

John E. Mack -Not That Trustworthy It Seems

 I have been "quiet" here but as my posts generally receive 100% no feedback or comments so it's like posting to myself.

One thing I have been doing is looking at the last of the "Big Three" abduction researchers (Hopkins, Jacobs, Mack) John E. Mack.

I have always considered Mack to have been a professional and being independent and unbiased when it came to abduction cases.  Then I heard rumours. Rumours I took at first to be nothing more than jealous slander or debunkers at work. So I decided to look into Mack and his abduction research and methods.

With a deep breath I have to say that I believe that Mack was biased in that he did not investigate. He talked and listened to "experiencers"/ "abductees" and "Contactees"  and even in the case of known fakes such as Carlos Diaz, he declared that he believed them and their families because "why would they lie about this?"

Money.

I think Mack's work loses credibility when we see him interviewed and what he says. He was not outrightly faking like Hopkins. He was not making stuff up and losing the plot like Jacobs. Mack was gullible and not credible in that he could have researched someone like Diaz and seen how the Lorenzens at APRO tore his story apart -we even know that the UFO in one of his photos is a type of locally produced lamp. Mack did not know that? 

For me I think this destroys the last of the big three abduction researchers and that none of them have or had credibility -and a lot of people knew this before Hopkins died., Knew this before Mack died. No one bothered (in Ufology) to set the record straight back then or since because lies make money and Ufology is all about making money.

Yeah, I was a dumb ass and got taken in but Hopkins I got doubts about and even put questions to (ignored) and I did try to set the record straight with Jacobs but...oh boy.

And what do I always say? NEVER EVER trust a Ufologist