Total Pageviews

Saturday, 14 November 2015

Captured! The Betty And Barney Hill UFO Experience -review


  • http://www.ainsworthbooks.com/shop_image/product/17387.jpg
Paperback: 320 pages
Publisher: New Page Books,US (30 Sept. 2007)
ISBN-10: 1564149714
ISBN-13: 978-1564149718
Product Dimensions: 22.7 x 15.5 x 2 cm


The book blurb reads:

" Today, 46 years after the UFO abduction of Betty and Henry Hill, more and more people are convinced that UFO's are real and that governments are covering up their existence. If you have doubts or questions about the Hill case or alien experiences ingeneral, CAPTURED! will give you the answers you're searching for.

The 1961 abduction of the Hills stirred worldwide interest, primarily because of the book The Interrupted Journey, the subsequent media coverage and a 1975 TV movie, The UFO Incident. The case is mentioned in almost all UFO abduction books. It, also, became a target for debunkers, who still attack it today. But the complete story of what really happened that day, its effect on the participants and the findings of investigators has never been told…until now.

In CAPTURED!...you'll get an insider's look at the alien abduction, previously unpublished information about the lives of the Hills before and after Barney's death in 1969, their status as celebrities, Betty's experiences as a UFO investigator and other activities before her death in 2004.

Kathleen Marden, Betty Hill's niece, shares details from her discussions with Betty and from the evidence of the UFO abduction. She, also, looks at the Hill's riveting hypnosis sessions about their time onboard the spacecraft. The transcripts of these sessions provide insight into the character of the aliens, including their curiosity, their democratic discussions and their desire to avoid inflicting pain.

In addition, co-author, physicist and ufologist Stanton T. Friedman, the original civilian investigator of the Roswell Incident, reviews and refutes the arguments of those who have attacked the Hill case, including the star map Betty Hill saw inside the craft and later recreated."

I became interested in what accounts of "Occupants" (as we called them)  of so-called flying saucers might be able to tell, since reports of lights-in-the-sky (LITS) told us literally nothing and those of seemingly constructed craft did not give us the "nuts and bolts" we needed.  For me, finding out more about Occupant physiology might offer explanations in one form or another.  Yes, our rockets took men into space and to the Moon and the rockets and capsules work like this or that -but how did the journey affect the men flying in them?  How did they get chosen or trained to sit on multiple tons of explosive fuel and ride those flying bombs into space?

I very early on dismissed Adamski and other Contactees.  The stories were so full of holes and how people were believing the crap they were dishing out dumbfounded me -but, yes, I was fascinated by how they accepted it -their thinking.

Then, in the early 1970s, I came across a book by John G. Fuller -The Interrupted Journey. People I spoke to kept referring to a "mixed race" couple which is pure nonsense.  There is only one race on Earth -humans and who gives a flying fig what skin colour was involved?  In fact, I had to take this into account later to understand the reasoning of some critics and Ufologists (pro or con) even though it was still irrelevant.

I was left in two minds. I had heard of "space-nappings" before such as Antonio Villas Boas, but this was the first that seemed to have any effort made to substantiate what happened, even if I was unsure how hypnosis was going to help.

When I finished the book I was stumped.  What did other Ufologists think?  Well, two that I recall responded with "Well, it was a white woman married to a black man -no idea what they might be up to!" Two less Ufologists to talk to, I thought.  Others told me that believing this junk would mean no one taking me seriously -"at least Adamski had the foot-prints in the desert and photographs!" and they were being seriously.  In fact, no one I talked to really wanted to commit themselves on the case -Norman Oliver, then of BUFORA, was one of the very rare ones who told me he believed the Hills.

But over the years there was "this" allegation and "that" explanation.  I heard that Betty Hill thought she could telepathically communicate with aliens and would spend hours alone claiming to do so. There were the claims that Betty was a huge sci fi fan.  Barney was the very impressionable husband who was brow-beaten by Betty into believing things. Betty claimed to have been abducted several times.  It went on and on and yet, when you listened to the recordings of the hypnosis sessions that have been used you realise something must have happened.

Then the explanation.  Betty and Barney being a "mixed race" couple were caught at a makshift roadblock by racist youths and attacked.  it was so horrifying that the torch-light used to flag them down before the attack became a flying saucer and the attackers aliens. At least two magazines and then a lot of Ufologists accepted the idea.  I mean, kidnappers from space?  We all know how racist, violent and out-of-control youths are, right?

Utter pig-swill.

Then I recall Dr Carl Sagan, not one of my favourite people as I've explained before, dealt very briefly with the Hill's and the Fish "star map".  He was a big science media star and in a few minutes destroyed the case and star-map...with complete and utter inaccuracies.

While building up the AE - CE IIIK data base and preparing work for a previously unpublished AOP Bureau report on these cases in the UK, I have been reading a lot of books. Karla Turner, Jacobs and others.  So when I saw this book I thought "Why not?"  I mean, Stanton T. Friedman has a solid reputation and Kathleen Marden was Betty Hill's niece and has all her notes and correspondence. To be truthful I was not expecting to find out a great deal -perhaps a little one-sided in the Hills' favour.

In fact, this book is far better than The Interrupted Journey and includes data never revealed in that book.  Those 21 growths on Barney's groin that could not be identified but were medically removed -if only they had been preserved!  We learn that there was a USAF radar-visual incident involving a UFO and a possible air-intercept attempt along with a UFO sighting on the same evening as the couple claimed they were abducted.

The whole Marjorie Fish star-map story is gone into and, honestly, I came away feeling that this was a strong piece of evidence and, no, Betty would not have been able to fake the chart based on looking at astronomy books at the time.

Page 199-200 refers to what may be one of the first recorded  trance "experiencers" and that I found fascinating because at that time this had never been encountered before.

I think, reading the book, that the sighting of a craft with possible occupant after Barney's death may well have been an hallucination -if you read the book you'll see why.  However that in no way denigrates the original case because there was no extreme stress or ill health involved.  A photo taken by Betty and reproduced on p. 214 is said to show a shadowy figure in a craft window and " possibly stereotypical gray alien emerging from the right side of the disk."  Sadly, due to reproduction of the image on a text page all I can see is two white dots and certainly no shadowy alien or gray let alone a disc-shaped craft. For that reason  I have to throw that out and was one of the weaker elements of the book -but essential to give an overall picture of events.

When it comes to "Betty's fall from grace" in Ufological circles I can say only that it seems that age and Betty wanting to prove UFO reality combined, and yet she so succinctly summed up modern abduction investigators and abductees (pp. 271-272).  And she refers to Dr Simon (who conducted their treatment in the early 1960s) concern that hypnosis would be incorrectly used and exploited by individuals not properly trained -40 years on he is proven correct.

The explanation for claims that Betty thought she could telepathically communicate with aliens is interesting.  In fact most of those claims were bogus.  Betty was taking part in experiments under supervision of no less than Dr J. Allen Hynek and Jacques Vallee amongst others.  These were scientifically minded people who had to become radical thinkers to try to solve the UFO mystery in one way or another.

Oh, and Betty was not  a sci fi fan.

If there is a reason for why Betty came "off track" other than her ill health in later years it was because she wanted to help others who had seen UFOs or claimed to have been abducted and wanted to prove the reality of UFOs.  And this is where Ufology let her down.  Rather than look at the possibility that repeater sightings were possible -or prove they were not (I recall arguing with Ufologists in the 1970s over this: one case from a witness was accepted but a week later the man reported a similar object moving in another direction -both reports were marked as "unreliable" because the witness had two sightings!).  And while working on the AOP Bureau's Grey Book report I realised that there was nothing "weird" or "unbelievable" or even other worldly about someone saying "I sensed something was going to happen and looked over the field and suddenly a UFO appeared" -the explanation lay in science and this might be why Betty realised something was "off" and saw later objects.

Was this book slanted with a Hill bias?  Yes.  But only because Marden and Friedman possessed the information that Ufologists had not seen or known of before.

I am accused of being a Skeptic.  I have defined what that means before but it does not mean dismiss all material/evidence because you can without looking at it.

I read this book over Saturday and Sunday (with a break for the Rugby World Cup) and had expected to come up with a list of reasons why the Hill case might be "just another explainable abduction" after all these years.

I actually put the book down realising that Betty and Barney Hill were not the people portrayed by debunkers.  They were plain ordinary human beings who fought for civil rights and social justice and were held in high esteem in their local and wider communities.  They did not become rich from re-telling their story.  They never claimed repeated abductions. They just told their story and stuck to it.  In fact, it is quite clear that the couple probably would have been much happier had they not encountered that UFO. Had they not needed to see Dr Simon to try to find out why Barney was suffering ill health and stress.

In a way, Antonio Villas Boas was lucky.  He reported his account and carried on with his life as normal.  The Hills, due to betrayal of confidence from a number of sources, never had that option.  There is the case of Lydia whose abduction Betty helped investigate.  When word got out Lydia and her family moved to another state and, I assume, settled down to carry on their lives.  The Hills never had that option.

It does not make me feel uneasy to write this (after 40+ years of looking at these cases that would be odd!) but, unlike the Abduction Epidemic since the mid 1980s and all the claims, I have to write that I believe the Hills.  Betty stated that she believed these beings came down, took someone onto their craft, did their tests and made them forget (even if not permanently) and released them.  That's it.  Not many millions of abductees as some claim.

But two days ago I never expected to sit down and write that, after 40 years, I am even more certain that Betty and Barney Hill were abducted by aliens.  Pure and simple.

The book is far superior to Fuller's and I recommend this one highly.

The Complete Review: Alien Dawn by Colin wilson


https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/35/e4/f3/35e4f31993114967852588873ca3d84d.jpg 
I have to say that I was really looking forward to Colin Wilson's"investigation into the Contact experience" -Alien Dawn as you probably read here:http://terryhooper.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/colin-wilsons-alien-dawnwhoa.html
 When I read what he had concluded I could not wait to see what he had discovered in the way of facts to reach that conclusion.  I count Wilson's book, Poltergeist, as a classic of research so I opened up the book.
 
I have this habit of using Post-It notes in books and magazines with scribbles denoting points of interest. There are a few in this book.  However there are many where I have corrected the sources and information Wilson bases his findings on.
For one thing, waxing lyrical over John Keel and his adventures and ultra terrestrials or whatever is bad. B A D because, as I discovered through research, Keel was quoting sources that were very dubious and spinning a yarn -this was his "business" after all.  Like the "fact" that an officer in the British Army during World War 2 headed a flying saucer project -which Air Vice Marshal Sir Victor Goddard had to point out more than a few times was a fantasy.  Never happened. The UK at that time expercted a German invasion at any time and "we did not expect to survive long" -as Sir Victor and others pointed out.  To suggest that at that time an Army officer was acting outside of all Military Intelligence departments and taking money to look at "lights" was ridiculous.
I do not for one minute accept anything Keel wrote unless I can check original sources.
Jacques Vallee and his theories which he seemed to hot then cold then hot on again. Vallee quotes sources such as Italian Ufologist Fenoglio -a KNOWN hoaxer- and never corrects the record and still uses those cases. One of the first things the AOP Bureau did was look at Ortotheny, the "Mars Cycle" and cases cited by Vallee -the first two took two days to dismiss (a day in the case of "ley lines") and then Vallees case data base proved far from accurate. In fact, I, personally, began to doubt Vallee had done any original research on reported cases -as with Alencon, 1790.
But there is worse.  Wilson uses information from Harold T. Wilkins whom my late colleague Franklyn A. Davin-Wilson noted: "Has just as many un-named sources and dubious facts as Frank Edwards".  Wilkins was known to make up really good sounding sources that turned out to not exist or have the information in he had 'quoted' and he was a known plagiarist. I have tracked down a number of sources he referred to and found details not to match or to have been "re-edited" by Wilkins.
Wilson cites flying saucer Contactee hoaxer, criminal and terrorist Aladino Felix who wrote as Dino Kraspendon!
Wilson refers to the Byland Abbey UFO sighting in the Middle Ages -PROVEN and ADMITTED to be a hoax in the 1950s and 1960s as an example of UFOs in the past -and the Alencon episode!
Add to this mix dubious Crop Circles, ghosts and poltergeists, Uri Geller and Puharich, the Fatima Miracle, "synchronicities", time slips and a heap of other stuff and the conclusion Wilson reached is (I'm trying not to use a very rude word) bovine excrement.
Sure, Wilson says he purchased lots of UFO books but had never really been into the subject and it shows.
This is what happens when you get someone who is just jumping into a subject but has only books as reference and has never investigated cases of abduction or UFO sightings but relies on second hand information from sources as noted.  There are examples in the book of abductees (yes, he does mention them now and then) who are describing -clearly- altered state trances but Wilson seems to accept this as part of the manipulating force behind UFOs and other things that seem strange.
There are glimpses of Wilson citing cases and ideas that he does not follow through on and it makes you wonder what he was thinking?  Although there are some interesting points I think that, by writing this book and using the sources he did, Wilson negates his own conclusion.  As Franklyn used to say "With computers the person puts in wrong data the computer spits out wrong data" and that's what we have here.
Want to see how many correction notes I put in the book until I gave up (but I will be adding more later!)?
Now back to the last couple chapters and I will return to this book! 
And here I am!
This book is around 1" thick (2.5cms).  With all the new notes I have added it is now 3" (7.5cms) thick. I have to say I am more than a little disappointed. Wilson certainly has a big "man-crush" on keel and Vallee.
Robin Collyns book Did Spacemen Colonise The Earth is cited in one chapter but as my late colleague Franklyn Davin-Wilson wrote about it: "He (Collyns) spent 12 years researching this book -yet it still contains glaring errors" and Franklyn annotated the book with many corrections. 
Wilson also seems to greatly admire a man who challenges Einstein and many others in science, Donald Hotson. In fact, Wilson gives up a great deal of space to Hotson's theories which had me asking out loud "What the **** has this to do with UFOs??"  But who is this great thinker who, like Wilson it seems, thinks Einstein was wrong? Bill Zebuhr in  Issue 86, July/August 2009, of Infinite Energy Magazine http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue86/hotson.html   writes:
" Don has studied a lot of physics but does not have a formal degree in it. In an undergraduate course he was told to forget a career in physics..."
Zebuhr praises Hotson but others tend not to.  But I'm not arguing physics just stating Wilson goes off on a tangent over unproven theories.
Then: "It is often stated that the 1961 abduction of Barney and Betty Hill is the first abduction case on record..."  Wilson claims he read about 200 UFO books but he clearly did not take much in if Vallee or Keel or Watkins were not involved.  Incidentally, I've read far, far more that 500 UFO books not to mention thousands of UFO publications, edited them and even carried out a few hundred UFO sighting/entity case investigations and been researching for well over 45 years. I DO take it all in.  The Hill case is described as "the first fully documented UFO abduction case" not the very first (see my review of Captured! here: http://terryhooper.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/captured-betty-and-barney-hill-ufo.html )
 
 Jacques Vallee
 
 
On p. 227 Wilson cites the case of teenager Andrea (one of Hopkins' subjects) who was a "virgin, and her hymen was still unbroken" and Andrea got pregnant after "dreaming of having sex with a bald man with 'funny eyes'" -so  another alien experiment, right? Foetus no doubt went missing? No. Andrea had an abortion....something off here?
Wilson does refer to the possibility of the hypnotist somehow telepathically conveying ideas to a hypnotised subject (as suggested by Ann Druffel in How To Defend Yourself Against Alien Abduction).  I will not knock that theory.  It is odd how Hopkins' subjects had stories conforming to his theories, Jacobs ditto and Mack -ditto.  Wilson also notes how easily hypnotised subjects were used in crimes -one woman to forget her rape and being sold on to other men (p. 228).
Now, then comes the Linda Cortile case (as outlined in Hopkins' book Witnessed) -and abduction from a tower block witnessed  by diplomats and security and head of the United Nations at the time, Javier Pérez de Cuéllar.  Wilson notes how Hopkins knew one of the security men, Richard, was a top security man because he had a photo of the man standing next to President Regan -but writes that Hopkins never met Richard; all contact was via letter!  In fact, I had supported Hopkins since his first published book but Witnessed just read like a man being "fed a line" -conned.  And De Cuellar never witnessed anything -and I believe everyone accepts that.  Why the hoax was perpetrated who knows but Hopkins realising Linda "was one of them (alien)" was the nail in his coffin.  Read the book and you will see why.
But Wilson seems to accept all of this...it is we narrow, closed-minded folk who do not understand.
Wilson points to the "missing foetus" and Ann Druffel, again, solved this back in the early 1990s but Wilson does not know this.
I did choke when I read that an account came from the "Highly respected Timothy Good"  but then, Wilson quotes cases of what seem to be "altered states" -abductees leaving their bodies from cars and even in a crowded hall.  There are obvious fantasists and even hallucinatory experiences but all point toward Wilson's theory.  "Psychic Warrior" David Morehouse is quoted stating that he had used his powers to learn that Korean Flight 007, shot down by the Soviet Union in 1983, was on a spying mission. Bit of a fib based on facts that Wilson could have checked to see how good a source he was.  No mention of the USAF RC-135 spy plane that the Soviets took KAL 007 to be.
And on p. 294 the great Ufologist Wilson tells us how, by the 1960s, the idea of extra-terrestrial visitors was a dead theory.  Feck me I missed that one!  Utter, pardon the language, bull-shit.
But then we have "past life experiences", Out Of Body Experiences, cases of the paranormal and psychic abilities basically telling us that we do not know the power of our own minds.
Oh, and though I do think that Richard Dawkins is full of himself but stating "trying to answer the ultimate question by pretending it is not there"??? And Stephen Hawking ("the cosmologist" -oooh, bitchy) comes in for a blasting (have I mentioned that Wilson does not rate Einstein highly either?) because he believes science will eventually find the answer to almost everything "this entails the corollary that God is an unnnecessary hypothesis".  And "Hawking is burying his head in the sand". 
Then he meanders into Planck, Bohrs, Heisenberg and Quanta for pages while I sat wondering what was going on.  He mentions the 1974 Avely (Essex) Abduction but then goes on to say that up until 1977 "there were no other abductee reports in Britain" and I again swore.  What was I cataloguing and investigating since 1974 then?  By this time I was mentally shouting "You utter ill-informed ass!"
"Indian Miracle Man" Sai Baba stated that UFOs come from the heart and the heart is God and this is where UFOs come from.  Well...mystery solved....or is it?  Because Sai Baba was not the best person to add theory to your data just read Miracle Man Or petty magician? Will the real Sai Baba please standup: http://www.saibaba-x.org.uk/15/Sunday_Magazine.html
David M. Jacobs
 
 
But it goes on.  Abductee Linda Porter stating that all abductees are part aliuen if not actually aliens -putting a target on those claiming to be abductees -the aliens "fifth column" on Earth.  David M. Jacobs also claims this but seems to have no thought of consequences for people who have claimed to be abductees.
Wilson seems to reiterate on p.338 in a massive outlet of ego, that He never thought Einstein got it wrong.  T. C. Lethbridge in 1931, during a heavy rainstorm saw a "typical ball of light"...yes, we would call it "ball lightning", dear.
Budd Hopkins
 
 
It seems that the chief mistake of we mere mortals is that we assume all UFOs are solid craft.  But Wilson realises the truth. Well, with the AOP Bureau in 1982 we realised that UFO catalogues and sighting reports consisted of those of alleged solid constructed craft (if those reports were true), misidentifications, meteorites, various meteorological phenomena and unknown natural phenomena -that I witnessed at least three times at close quarters.  A jumble of things making up a very strange and almost impossible to believe 'phenomenon' or, rather, "phenomena".  
 
 
THAT is why it makes no sense. The AOP came to understand this, or rather I did since it was my job to assess cases for study, in three hours of just looking at the reports.
Vallee obviously did not and took it all at face value.
Wilson notes how abductions have a lot of similarities but not all the dissimilarities.  And that they "make no sense".  You think he'd get the point.  Even when he mentions an H. G. Wells story of rays from space changing Earth children into highly intelligent 'Martians' -and the story teller then realising he himself is "one of them" the penny does not drop. 
 The Midwich Cuckoos (1957) by John Wyndham has been summarised thus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Midwich_Cuckoos:
below: Hubrids? Hybrids? No -Midwich Cuckoos....look familiar?
https://www.denverlibrary.org/files/village-of-the-damned-original.jpg
"Ambulances arrive at two traffic accidents blocking the only roads into the (fictional) British village of Midwich, Winshire. Attempting to approach the village, one paramedic becomes unconscious.

Suspecting gas poisoning, the army is notified. They discover that a caged canary becomes unconscious upon entering the affected region, but regains consciousness when removed. Further experiments reveal the region to be a hemisphere with a diameter of 2 miles (3.2 km) around the village. Aerial photography shows an unidentifiable silvery object on the ground in the centre of the created exclusion zone.


After one day the effect vanishes along with the unidentified object, and the villagers wake with no apparent ill effects. Some months later, the villagers realise that every woman of child-bearing age is pregnant, with all indications that the pregnancies were caused by xenogenesis during the period of unconsciousness referred to as the "Dayout".


When the 31 boys and 30 girls are born they appear normal except for their unusual, golden eyes and pale, silvery skin. These children have none of the genetic characteristics of their parents. As they grow up, it becomes increasingly apparent that they are, at least in some respects, not human. They possess telepathic abilities, and can control others' actions. The Children (they are referred to with a capital C) have two distinct group minds: one for the boys and another for the girls. Their physical development is accelerated compared with that of humans; upon reaching the age of nine, they appear to be sixteen-year-olds.

The Children protect themselves as much as possible using a form of mind control. One young man who accidentally hits a Child in the hip while driving a car is made to drive into a wall and kill himself. A bull who chased the Children is forced into a pond to drown. The villagers form a mob and try to burn down the Midwich Grange, where the Children are taught and live, but the Children make the villagers attack each other."


Above: from John Carpenter's 1995 movie...again, looks familiar.
 
 
Alien hybrid kids with mind control powers -familiar?  Two films from this Village of The Damned (1960) and then Children of The Damned.  Lots of publicity for the MGM remake of 1981 that never happened but John Carpenter remade Village of The Damed in 1995.  There are lots of sci fi films, TV programmes, comic books and magazine stories and articles on the same theme.  Wilson doesn't mention these.  However about ten years ago I termed "alien hybrid children" with the better name of "Midwich Cuckoos".  Andrija Puharich of Uri Geller fame was looking into such "mentally gifted" children before his death.

Wilson feels that 'aliens' or whatever force is behind the alien fakery, is helping to develop new humans -like the ones Puharich was looking into.  John Mack was right, it seems...in a way.

I re-read what Publishers Weekly wrote about this book:

 "In over 80 books, Wilson (From Atlantis to the Sphinx) has reported on a wide variety of alternate realities involving crime, sex and the occult, all based on the underlying premise that our everyday consciousness is meager compared with powers potentially available to us.

This attempt at a synthesis of the alien/UFO phenomenon shows Wilson's encyclopedic strength to be also his weakness. In his zeal for inclusiveness, he reports not only on the history of UFOs from mythology through Kenneth Arnold to Philip Corso (The Day After Roswell), but also writes about Uri Geller, LSD research, crop circles, ley lines, the Loch Ness monster, remote viewing, Jung, hypnotism, poltergeists, Ouspensky, out-of-body experiences, quantum physics and a great deal more.

There is little new here: much of the book is composed of un-foot noted second- and third-hand accounts of UFOs, alien encounters and (perhaps) related phenomena drawn from other sources, resulting in an unfocused catalogue of anecdotes, the larger import of which is rarely assessed.

Periodically Wilson asks, as if talking to himself: "What, then, are we to make of it all?" At times he finds unbelievability a plus: after all, if someone were simply fabricating a story, wouldn't they make it more plausible?

By the time readers reach the chapter titled "Oh no, not again!" the phrase has an unintended inflection. In the end, Wilson seems to regard aliensAwhatever they areAas agents in the transformation of human consciousness, but he provides little solid support for, or elucidation of, such a hypothesis
."

I purchased this book because I really rated Wilson from some previous works including Poltergeist, which I consider(ed) a classic.  I just could not believe what I read.  This is a classic example of jumping on the abduction bandwagon and spouting so much nonsense -as stated in the quote above.  This is what you get when someone who has no knowledge of the history or subject matter buys a lot of books and splutters on for 371 pages.  This is NOT "the most comprehensive bird's eye view of the subject ever undertaken" -that is a pure bull shit statement (well, its Virgin Books).

Pilot sightings of UFOs, radar-vizual cases...I could go on but these are not even touched on.  Just "Keel and Vallee were almost right but I've sorted it all out from my study"

A very, very, very, VERY disappointing book and I would never recommend it.

CE IIIK Project Up-Date


I have to say that I am rather disappointed. It seems that American and Canadian UFO investigators and researchers are not in the least bit interested in working on this project.

I contacted two groups with information on the 1954 Garson, Canada CE IIIK report...still no responses. Ah, for the old days before computers when we did cooperate!

That written, at least the Germans, French and Spanish are jumping into the project and have already forwarded reports that I've added to the archive.  In the new year I'll need to start a basic catalogue so we can see where the gaps in information are.

I also have to write that absolutely nothing has been found regarding the 1958 Tarland, Scotland alleged landing.  Flying Saucer Review has offered to put a request in the next issue to see if any of their older readers can add information but this is, as it stands, either a very badly handled case -ie. absolutely no one looked into it- or a hoax....by whom, though?

It has become quite clear, while adding new reports to new File folders that, like the 40 and 35 years old folders, a great deal of the material needs to be properly up-dated and presented.  This is going to be a long term project and so far it's already costing me a large amount in ink cartridges for the printer!

So, keep popping by.

UK UFO Groups and The AE and CE IIIK Project


I have to say I am a little disappointed with UK UFO groups.  The AE and CE IIIK Project has received cooperation from France and Spain (just waiting on the Germans) but the UK -nothing.
What I did was go online and check UFO groups listed in the United Kingdom.  There were lots of them that were set up around 1995 at the height of the UFO TV craze.  99% described themselves as "dedicated to a lifelong search for the truth"  some added "We will not stop until the UFO mystery is solved.  Most of the groups and people who founded them after "getting into UFOs around 1995/1996" (which is very telling) are now no longer active.
No Albert K. Bender or Men In Black.  Interest just fizzled out.  I've seen this over-and-over again in the past few decades.  Sadly, many UFO witnesses or even abductees are then left hanging.  What a mess.
Anyway, I've sent out more emails because sending letters out (at 65p a time!) is bloody expensive when twenty letters have received no replies.  Let's see how it goes.
And yesterday evening and today, up until 1600 hrs (I have to eat) I have been up-dating the UK entries for the 1980s.  Postage and ink cartridges -could it get any more expensive?  But for today that is it.  I'm taking a day off as I await a delivery of...more ink cartridges!
Any serious investigators/researchers -UK or in other countries- want to get involved then please read this:

"Flying Saucer Review created the term Humanoid"

The Humanoids was an October-November 1966 special issue published by Flying Saucer Review. It was later released in book form. Why do I me...