Josef Allen Hynek

 

"Would yield more information about the UFO Problem"

 

As I have noted before -and on the CE3K/AE Face Book page- Ted Bloecher led the field from the 1950s when it came to "Humanoid" (or not humanoid) reports.  When the 1960s found more such reports emerging there were two civilian UFO organisations, well, one when you think about it: APRO run by James and (mainly) Coral Lorenzen and NICAP headed by Donald E. Keyhoe (infiltrated and eventually destroyed from within by the CIA...sound familiar to recent UAP stuff?).

NICAP dismissed such reports though some of its members did look into them. APRO looked into the various accounts and not just from the United States but from around the world. In 1974 I explained that it was well and good recording lights in the sky (LITS) and fly overs but if we knew who or what was controlling these craft (when any other explanation was rule out) we might get a better idea of what was going on.

In a couple of years I will have been studying CE3K/AE reports for 50 years which is frightening to think of the years I've spent on this. All unfunded, although I have tried and failed.

I just received a reprint (not the best but trying to get an original copy in the UK is impossible) of the Lorenzens' 1977 book Abducted! Confrontations With Beings From Outer Space. It has certain quality issues but it shows how far ahead they were of those who later destroyed the research (Hopkins, Jacobs, Carpenter and others). There are no photographs or illustrations, I was sure that there was in the original but that copy was stolen back in 1979!

Anyway, I found a paragraph in the Foreword by the couple of interest:

    "In 1967 we wrote a book entitled Flying Saucer Occupants which enjoyed brisk sales. But, as we were to learn in later years, it was "ahead of its time." One of our colleagues who reviewed the book for a UFO journal labeled it "just another wild book." However, our judgement seems to have been vindicated.  In 1975, the same fellow, writing this time in a large circulation magazine, admitted that investigation of cases involving close encounters with UFO occupants and "abductions" would yield more information about the UFO problems than the fly-over, hovering, or landed UFO cases."

We had such hopes but the abduction crew threw everything away to get themselves celebrity and money.  As I have written before, you can still find people claiming to be 25, 30 or 35 years "Ufology veterans" who sit and shake their heads and state "And then we have the little guys -what's that all about?" Just what have they been doing for 25-35 years??

There was no crash at Aurora in the 19th century -that has been proven beyond doubt. Roswell? No. Spitzbergen -no. We have seen the Flatwoods report, like the Kelly event and even "Mothman" be rebooted and altered and so many 'eye-witnesses' never heard of before popping up to give 'new' information that the original reports mean nothing. Annual pop culture events surround each of these events. 

I am not (I seriously cannot be!) the only one studying these reports and I hope that, like myself, any other researcher is find the correlations in accounts from around the world. 

I'll continue until..they close the lid on me.

I delete posts after a certain time

 A repost to explain as I have been putting a lot of work in to translate and edit and people are stealing (ie publishing on their own sites without credit).

***************************************************************************

Exactly what I said would happen months ago. Someone was not reading the posts properly, were they?

I post a feature such as a report or long general article and I leave it up for 48 hours, sometimes I leave it a little longer. When, after that time, I see only 10 or 12 people have checked it and there is no response or comment it gets reverted back to a draft. Reverting it back to a draft means that those info thieves online can stop stealing and using my original research work.

As I have noted before -in 2021, 2020 and 2019- I am not indulging info thieves. Some of the posts may well form chapters in later books and though the books might not sell they provide proof of who did all the work that was stolen online.

Imagine you work all week and then when its time for that pay cheque you are told "Charlie says he did the work so we are paying him."  All the hours you worked and the effort you put in and Charlie gets the credit (even though you have no idea who Charlie is) and the money and praise.  Unfair? Yep, but its an example of how internet thievery works. A couple weeks back I posted a long report and added in photos and maps -many months of research. By the next day that work was chopped up and used by three others who also added fake info that will now go as 'fact'. Lots of congrats on all the work and effort.

You see what I mean?

So I delete posts after a certain time.

Bill Herrmann's hypnotic regression concerning his 1978 UFO experience a...

20th November, 1968 Staffordshire

 

   One might assume that Ufologists in the UK knew of this old case, however, I have not come across one who does which is a pity. The Ufologists involved in this were N. M. H. Turner and W. Daniels and their report was published in Flying Saucer Review (“The Milakovic Report”, FSR vol. 15 no.1, January 1969: pp. 2-3).

   On the 20^th November, 1968, a Yugoslavian couple, Milin and Doris Milakovic along with their son Slavic (11), were driving to their home of 432 Cannock Road, Hednesford, on a farm road across fields, near Hanbury, Staffordshire. Hednesford was described as “a rather small, drab town surrounded by mine workings and not far from the southern end of Cannock Chase.

   Trio had left Hednesford on a house-hunting trip, journeyed through the countryside to Rugeley, Abbots Bromley, and on the road home stopped at Hanbury to view Hanbury Hall, to look at an old house. They were on the Staffordshire-Derbyshire border, midway between Uttoxeter and Burton-on-Trent; there was an Army Central Workshop 3.5 miles to the northwest and a  Royal Air Force ammunition dump 2 miles to the northwest as well as a World War IT airfield used by the Ind Coope brewery firm for light aircraft 2 miles to the south.  The time was between 17:30 – 17:45 hrs and dusk was rapidly approaching.

 

   They first noticed a rabbit running away in the field on their left, then soon several more rabbits fleeing from a hedge on the left side of the road. They then noticed in the field on their left a brilliant object. It was at this point that Mr. Milakovic stopped the car to look at the object as it rose slowly and then flew above the car. All three had now left the car to watch the object and Doris noticed the air temperature felt much warmer as the object flew overhead and then decreased again as it flew away.

 

 Above a sketch made of the Milakovic object

   The object continued flying over the field to their right and then hovered over a house some 100 yards away; Doris specified that the object appeared to be as wide as the house below it.  Here the object quivered "like jelly" –possible heat haze? As for the shape of the object it had a dark bowl-shaped bottom with a clear dome on top. This dome was divided into vertical thirds – one third showing white light, one third, amber light, and the final third, green light.  Inside the lit dome area several humanoid figures were seen moving around and sometimes appeared to bend down as though looking at something below the rim. The trio observed all of this for an estimated 5 minutes.

   After that period of time the object began moving up in a "pulsating or jerky" movement; its light intensity greatly increased and Mr. Milakovic felt his eyes were burning. Mr. Milakovic, normally a brave man, became frightened and pushed both his wife and son into the car and drove away quickly.

   The object made no sound during the entire sighting. The wristwatches of the couple which had been working perfectly before the sighting had, afterwards, been running slow and it was suggested that they might have become magnetise. The Milakovic car was not tested for residual magnetism.  But there is, again, no chronology. We know roughly when the trio were in the car and that at some point they saw the rabbits which drew their attention to the object. There is an estimated 5 minutes of watching the object and entities within but no one seems to have asked at what time the family arrived home.  This could be important for certain reasons.

   Firstly, Mr Milakovic, when driving around with the investigators to find the house with what he thought was an aircraft hangar nearby could not find it. He seems to have become quite worked up over this and then claimed a certain spot to be the locale. He did not think it necessary to go back out with investigators again as he decided the place he picked was correct. Doris had pointed out a location with a house that she was sure was the site of the incident. It should be pointed out that on their journey before the sighting they had to stop and ask an elderly couple for directions. Mr Milakovic was certain the incident had taken place near an airfield.  Slavic would offer nothing as he did not wish to contradict his father.

   All of this confusion regarding location in itself could just be down to losing their way, though both were adamant on the sites they had pointed out.  We then have the second point to note. Mr Milakovic was described as being a fairly brave individual and he had been watching the object with his wife and son but, and only at this point, when the object moved away and the light from it increased and hurt his eyes (“felt as though his eyes were burning”) did he become “thoroughly alarmed”. Doris and Slavic felt a mixture of excitement, curiosity and apprehension. As they drove off the object was still over the field.

   Did more happen to the trio? We will never know because there appears never to have been a follow-up. There were reported threatening phone calls to keep away from the airfield and a group of students were supposed to turn up to take photographs and ask questions but never did.

 

 

Why Scientists Think They'll Find an Alien City Very Soon | Unveiled

Humanoid Encounters 1900-1929 : The Others Amongst Us by Albert Rosales

 

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09FS2TR45
• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Independently published (6 Aug. 2021)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 258 pages
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 979-8548708656
• 
  

The World's most amazing Humanoid encounter cases. 

The bizarre, real, global reports of; UFO occupants - Ultraterrestrials, Extraterrestrials, Intraterrestrials, Robots and more. Mysterious beings - Bigfoot, Flying Humanoids, Lightbeings, Skinwalkers and even stranger exotic humanoids. 

Albert S. Rosales is the world's leading expert on humanoid encounter cases.

Can I just say that the line "Albert S. Rosales is the world's leading expert on humanoid encounter cases" is absolute bull-poop. Firstly, not all the cases involve humanoid entities and really you need to investigate and research and even then you most certainly are not an "expert" -after almost 50 years I would never call myself an "expert". There is also the intro where Rosales calls out unnamed people for using his data uncredited. That is a huge pile of bull poop. and I will explain why.

Firstly, there are no investigations or case studies and this appears to be just a listing of known cases -a list you can find by going to the Hynek Center for UFO Studies and checking out Ted Bloecher and David F. Webb's Hum Cat index cards. Add a few cases such as you can find in many online sources and that's it. Aleister Crowley is on the cover and I looked twice and could not recall any account of his meeting humanoids (aliens etc). Well, the photo is again included in the book as someone one associated with Crowley is mention. uh-huh.

If you go the URE CAT (English and French version) you will find many of these reports (unless they are investigated and very few are investigated, you cannot call them cases) I know are fake, hoaxes and some are inaccurate which is why I gather as many sources as possible for my files. So calling out people who Rosales thinks took 'his' work (and it is available online anyway) is a tad rich.  Compiling a list of report summaries does not make you an expert on any subject let alone UFOs or CE3K/AE reports.

Now that I have disposed of the bull-shit let's look at the actual book. Typing the summaries up and compiling a book is work so even if some cases are not kosher (genuine) that deserves credit. What this series will be useful for is research and if you are looking up UFO sightings from 1900 or the 1920s and wonder whether there were any CE3K/AE reports from that period -open this book up and you can check. Never ever take it as 100% accurate but look at any reports and seek out other sources to see if they are consistent and always go back to the original source quoted. 

Hyperbole is part and parcel of selling and in publishing it is almost a must so I can look past that and the fact that no investigation or research is carried out and shown I can see these volumes as very useful for their reference sources as well as for adding cases you know of to it. I am about investigation and research so I may seem a tad harsh (people quote their "favourite tales" from the book like it is a collection of old fairy tales!) but that does not hide the fact that for reference this book is fine.

Will I be buying other volumes? Hmm. Possibly for a set of handy references (my files are far too bulky to keep pulling off the shelves!) so if you just want a collection of reports for a read or to base your own research on this is okay. 

The Watchers: The Secret Design behind UFO Abduction -Raymond E. Fowler

There are 386 pages in this book and to be honest I had only read through a few before I groaned. Fowler is a man who had the reputation of being a good old fashioned Ufologist who dug into cases until he solved them or they were left as unidentified.

Now I am beginning to wonder and re-assess.

Just how the whole Andreasson Affair as it is known stretched to so many books and won accolades I have no idea. I read the original book when it was published in...1979? At that time I thought the account was mind-blowing but I had concerns as things never sounded quite right -that dawned on me after the second reading.

Betty Andreasson (Luca after marrying another "abductee", Bob Luca) is a person with fundamental Christian beliefs -a little like Fowler. Normally a person's  faith is unimportant (some say that it is) but on reading the books it is evident that some aspects of Betty's experiences are tainted by those beliefs.  At one time this case was called "the best investigated abduction" but I am sorry to say that, in the abduction research, it can be called anything but.

Just as Dr Karla Turner's books are classic examples of how a rational person can be drawn into believing that they have undergone UFO abductions after no real interest in the subject so Fowler has provided us with a classic case of "Ufologist turned abductee". Investigating abduction claims can be mind blowing if you are not prepared and in Fowler's case he notes how even a standard CE3K would have been labelled as "crackpot claim" in the early days of his work. In the books we see him slowly stagger into the belief that he has been abducted from an early age and -as noted before- others do not verify things he believed happened when he was with them. Fowler also seems to put far more faith in hypnosis than he should have.

In this book, as with the previous ones, Fowler admits that he is totally blown away by the things Betty declares under hypnosis and how it indicates a technology we can only see as magical because it is beyond our understanding. We are led to one conclusion and hypothesis after another as Fowler tries to grasp just what is going on. At not one point, despite the incredible things Betty 'reveals', does Fowler even begin to question things. In fact he points out that he was basically on the edge of his seat waiting for the next taped hypnosis session to arrive in the post.

Now, whether Betty is prone to altered states -and some people (probably far more than we suspect) are- I do not know. The questions and study needed to ascertain this never seem to have been undertaken. To be fair, I do not think that the concept of altered states even entered the Ufology subject when this saga began. I was only made aware of it in the mid 1970s. Study the subject for yourself. A person can quite literally "zone out" in front of you and everything that happens to them in that state is real and happened. It actually did happen for them but did not happen for anyone else.

Again, I need to emphasise that this is not a mental illness. These people do not require locking up or referral for a psychiatric hospital. Their brains are active in a way that is normal for many people but not others. While some people see music in colours (synesthetes) others can see the world as numbers and equations. While some are highly literate others cannot be and suffer dyslexia and there are people with sharp mathematical minds  others suffer a numerical dyslexia known as dyscaculie. Musical geniuses and the tone deaf. Not everyone's minds work the same. We need to study how this all works far more and for UFOs and the "paranormal" I set out guidelines in UFO Contact?  

Think about the abductee who claimed to have started miscarrying a foetus and how the bathroom floor was covered in blood yet she got to a barn where she hid the hybrid foetus in a jar but then carried on normally. I've known women who have had premature births or lost babies in early pregnancy and they do not simply get up and on with the daily routine. And why did the abductees spouse not see all of the blood or his wife leavuing the house and bleeding profusely? The same reason an abductee claims to have had to go help the imbecilic alien hybrids hiding out on Earth to buy and move furniture and arrives home supposedly late but no one notices. The mind is a complex thing.

The problem with the Andreasson case is that hypnosis was used. Not in a sensible and measured way but with an almost cavalier manner. Because the hypnotist working with Fowler, Fred Max, could not make enough time for sessions and when Betty and Bob moved to Florida it was Bob who took over hypnosis sessions after Max implanted an hypnotic suggestion so that Betty could be regressed to the point covered in her last session. At this point I actually threw the book onto the floor. Bob had trained up with hypnosis and felt confident but let's make some points here:

(1)  Only a professionally qualified hypnotherapist should be employing regression hypnosis and here I am far from the way Max was using this.

(2)  Bob was not an experienced and qualified hypnotherapist and  without someone such as the investigator overseeing sessions and monitoring questioning this makes the sessions tainted.

(3)  Bob and Betty had discussed their UFO experiences and Bob was in his mind an "abductee" which makes his controlling the hypnosis sessions an extreme "no-no!" Do we ask bank robbers to investigate other bank robbers? The very idea that one person who claims to be a UFO abductee and who marries another claimed UFO abductee and that they discuss their experiences and he is put in charge of the regression hypnosis -that is almost unbelievable until you realise that you are talking about Ufology.

(4) Let's assume that Dr Leo Sprinkle was correct and that in some cases there may be a basic form of telepathy then where does that put us in this case? 

Even excluding telepathy this is on a par (almost) with David Jacobs and his phone sessions. Looking at it another way this could have been one big act with Betty and Bob deciding in advance what they were going to put on tape. As evidence those tapes are valueless. In fact, I think it can be safely said that the Andreasson books demonstrate that Dr Benjamin (who correctly used hypnosis on the Hills) and his worst fears were realised and that hypnosis was going to be misused and seen as a a tool to get unquestionable 'truth' from UFO percipients (again see UFO Contact?).

Looking at it from an investigation point of view the assertion is made that "so many people under hypnosis come up with the same descriptions and facts -so these have to all be genuine accounts!" No. People here or see TV shows and think "Odd. I'm sure that happened to me -does that mean....?" Waking up at various times naturally now becomes an "indicator of abduction" and "I have a scar and even my mother can't remember how I got it (30-40 years ago) -does that mean...?"  And time and again we read or hear "I was walking through the mall and I saw this alien face on the book cover and it struck a chord in my memory" -they buy the Streiber or Hopkins book with that image on the cover and start reading. After months or weeks at best, they contact a Ufologist who is told all the usual guff and he/she declares "Sounds like you are a UFO abductee" and I am sure that more than one sees a book or TV appearances coming up.  

There is a great deal of cross-contamination amongst alleged UFO abductees accounts and where things do not match no panic -we know Jacobs can put a twist on that and we have learnt that Hopkins "stacked the decks" to make things match. People read the Streiber, Hopkins, Jacobs and Fowler books to see whether they "might" be abductees and then you have the influence of TV shows. All of this gets into the memory and when the hypnotist says "Can you dig deeper and think of anything else about that incident?" in pops the appropriate false memory as 'fact'.

The hypnosis sessions with Andreasson spans the 1970s and into the 1980s (for this book published in 1990) and the number of sessions is something that any serious person should baulk at as the mind will build on one sessions revelations after another.  Hypnosis should only be used by someone who is fully qualified and only when it is necessary to help a possible percipient with something that is causing mental and or physical health issues. "Let's see...we had Part 1 then Part 2 so let's go for Part 3!" is not acceptable.

I do not think that Fowler deliberately exploited Andreasson and neither did he oversee the misuse of hypnosis. In fact he did not oversee the sessions carried out by Bob and he, like many Ufologists, fell into the false belief that regression hypnosis only revealed true events -hence he fell into the trap of self delusion -believing he is a UFO abductee- as well as false belief in that "aliens own our bodies and souls" and that we are so far beneath them technologically that we can do nothing and, possibly, maybe these are not extra-terrestrials. All based on jumping head first into a case he was not prepared for.

We have the first classic -Karla Turner then the second classic case of a Ufologist allowing himself to believe that he is a UFO abductee and the third classic; the Andreasson Affair where things started easily but soon spiralled out of control to the point where everything is abduction oriented. Turner, Fowler and Andreasson (as a case) should be must reading for anyone who is thinking of concentrating solely on CE3K/Alien Entity cases which are rarer than Ufologists would have you believe and the massive pop culture "Greys generational abduction of humans" has bogged the subject down for over three decades.

The book is fascinating reading but for the wrong reasons.

1941 Kidderminster, Worcestershire

 Source: John Hanson, Haunted Skies Vol. 1, pp 26-27

 

“Alison Richards, a woman in her late 60s, whom we met on a number of occasions at her Kidderminster home.  We were accompanied by Phil Hoyle of the Shrewsbury UFO Group, a man who specialises in counselling women claiming to have been the subject of alien abduction experiences.

“Alison outlined her early childhood memories, from when she was aged between five and six.

“These included a series of bizarre, frightening experiences while living with her badly crippled mother in a tiny cottage lit by gas and candles…

“At the time her father, a soldier with the Ninth Army, was away fighting in North Africa, during 1941:

‘When Mum went to bed she had to bandage on a metal splint to her leg, as her only way of getting about was to hop.

‘It was always an unwritten rule that if I needed her, perhaps because of sickness, I would always go to her, except for when I had a visit from what I can only describe as ‘horse beings’, who always entered the room from out of the linen cupboard, next to the window over the stairs, when I would scream and shout for her.

‘By the time my Mum had reached the bedroom they had left via either the window, or the linen cupboard.

‘I kept telling Mum what I had seen.  She insisted horses could not physically get into the house, but I knew they were real because, on at least four occasions, they actually hurt me.  I would end up with flesh gouged out of my left leg on the shin bone, about the size of a five pence piece (Approx. 20mm). The injuries to my leg, (which always happened after the shortest one came into the room), frightened my mother.

‘She thought, to begin with, that I had caught the leg on a loose mattress wire on the bed spring.  She and a neighbour thoroughly checked the bed but could find no trace of what was causing these injuries to occur, always in the same place on the skin.’

Hanson notes:

“Sadly, Alison died in August 2008.  however, knowing her quite well, we wondered if the ‘horse entities’ she described had parallels with the small beings often described as ‘greys’. Whose role in abduction phenomena are well documented”.

THS:  The illustration accompanying this account clearly shows two ‘typical’ Greys so with no other description it has to be assumed that this is what Alison was referring to.  I do wonder with the mass of accounts of ‘demons’, ‘aliens’ and ghosts as well as many other evil things coming out of bedroom closets and cupboards in the UK and US how many people think of bricking them up.

The annoyance here is that we have “horse beings” as a description yet an illo of Greys who can in no way, shape or form be called horse-like. It is interesting that these encounters happened at night and that the entities vanished one way or another before Alison’s mother arrived –but in the abduction scenario we are told that people sleeping in the bed next to the abductee and in other rooms cannot be woken.

People, through diet or illness can develop leg sores –I know of two people (male) who have had these for years. It happens so even if we rule out self-inflicted wound there is still no evidence of this being caused by ‘aliens’.

Obviously we have no case history.  Any corroboration of strange events or even when Alison first contacted Phil Hoyle or what actions he took.

Conclusion: Repeated dreams or hypnagogic –she was awake enough by the time her mother arrived. Like so many cases nothing of interest unless one is interested in the number of ‘abductees’ who exhibit signs of hypnagogia.

1961-04-18: Joe Simonton Pancake Encounter