You will often hear debunkers claim "They said it for the money or fame" which is a wide-sweeping statement that is intended to calm the nerves of those who are too stupid to question reports or assess the validity of a report. Quite simply, the mass of humanity is stupid and will believe what they are told.
Someone who is a very minor TV personality can make a comment on a case they have only read or heard about and what they say is fact. A scientist with the highest credentials and 4-5 decades of research behind then can speak factually on the same report. The minor TV personality will have their comment taken as "solid fact" because they appear on TV.
Mind you, some of those scientists also talk out of their asses to dismiss reports.
Look at this report for a fame seeking, money making scheme.
On the 26th February, 1979, at 0830hrs, Ernaldo Camusoni, aged 49, was cutting brush in the field where he is in duty as a rural representative, when he was surprised by a powerful light behind him. When he turned around, he saw a red-purplish object some 5 m in diameter that landed 40 m of him. In the back part of the UFO (via some sort of window?), a humanoid appeared, little more than 1 m of size but with a strong physique.
The entity advanced to within 3 metres of Emaldo and, it stopped "as if observing him" and it then turned around and returned into the object which then started to rise vertically and left at high speed to the south.
The next day a 14 m diameter circle of dry vegetation was found; within this was found "odd symmetrical traces inside".
Wow, well, Emaldo grasped fame and fortune with that bit of fakery, didn't he? No. In fact this is it. I checked -
"Ernaldo Camusoni, de 49 años, estaba cortando malezas en el campo donde se desempeña como encargado rural, cuando fue sorprendido por una potente luz a sus espaldas. Al darse vuelta, advirtió un objeto rojo-violáceo de unos 5 m. de diámetro que desciende a unos 40 m. De la parte posterior del ovni, surge entonces un humanoide de poco más de 1 m. do talla, pero de gran contextura fisica. El ocupante del ovni avanzo en dirección al testigo y, cuando hubo hecho unos 3 m., de detuvo como observándolo, giró, y retornó al objeto, el que comenzó luego a elevarse verticalmente, para partir a elevada velocidad en la misma dirección que habría venido (sud). Al día siguiente, se halló un círculo de vegetación seca, de unos 14 m. de diámetro, con peculiares trazas simétricas en su interior."
Yep, that is all there is to this case. Emaldo reported the incident and (I assume) CEFAI investigated. I write "assume" since CEFAI appears to be defunct and no one I contacted in Argentina has even heard of this, or seemingly any report pre 2000! I hope that somewhere there is a report on this incident and photographs of the unusual m,arkings within the 14m circle. If anyone knows a source PLEASE let me know.
What was the purpose for the object descending/landing and the entity approaching before going back into the object? No idea. We have absolutely no idea what any alien mind would be thinking or any strategy they might have. What I would like to find out is whether there was any possibility of time missing?
There are many similar reports to this and like Emaldo none of those involved are screaming out "I met an alien!" or vacuuming up the cash following press and TV junkets. Those people, like Emaldo, fade into obscurity and that is an end to it.
Source: Allemano, O. in CEFAI Bulletin, Buenos Aires, #9, March 1980 ; pp. 1/12.
No comments:
Post a Comment