Preaching To The Wind

It was in 1974 that I decided to look at "Humanoid"/"UFOnaut"/"Occupant" reports. As noted elsewhere I was openly laughed at and even ridiculed for doing so. "The silly nonsense won't get you any respect in the filed" I was told time and again. My response was always "Well, if you think these are intelligently controlled craft then they must be operated by someone or something and we can learn more about what is going on from the reports"

"Ho ho ho! We know who is flying these craft -Mr Adamski told us!"

Well, if the con man says so and you believe him...

The one thing that I found was that if someone was interested and wanted to get involved in the work they did not last long. The Dream sealed it.  The "Dream" usually involved the person in question dreaming about finding themselves in an isolated location (for me it was a shed of some type with a window) and they witness a UFO landing and see entities.  Basically, it was a dream created by the mind filling itself with so many reports and does not just happen with Ufology. I once worked, as a very young man, at a firm that created and sold prints of paintings. It involved rolling up prints, putting them into cardboard tubes -after a couple days I had a vivid dream in which I was carrying out this work -and I never quit the job!

But some saw this "Dream" as a warning. Or it just spooked them so much they did not want to look at another entity report.

For that reason I spent 51 years reading and listening to and watching absolutely anything on alleged real life entity encounters.  My friend in the United States, Travis Whitehurst even sent me tapes of Budd Hopkins' original talks and lectures to MUFON (those tapes were stolen long ago). What concerned me was that something was going on with hypnosis that I was very unsure about but I and many others were assured that all of the work was 100% peer reviewed. It never was.

On one tape, Hopkins described how one percipient reported seeing an animal -deer or similar. After that nothing. He decided that the percipient needed to be pushed to try to break through what he called a memory block -deliberately created to stop the percipient recalling what happened.  I thought "okay" after all this was all being peer reviewed. As things progressed it turned out that the deer or whatever was seen was in fact...aliens. Small aliens and they matched descriptions from cases we knew of.  Short, large headed -but NOT "Greys". Even the late Ann Druffel noted that before Hopkins we had short, large headed entities but never "Grays" (she really seemed to take exception to people writing "Greys" rather than the American spelling of "Grays"!).

However, Hopkins revealed that it was not just a sighting of entities but that there was missing time (I referred to these cases in the 1970s as "Time Loss Incidents"). And pushing the percipient even further under hypnosis "you need to break through this and see what really happened" we got on board experiences. This then jumped to examinations similar to that reported by the Hills. That got pushed even further until we eventually had the generational child -to-adult life time abductions. Eventually we even had reports of abductions of the mother and recall of Greys examining the percipient in the womb...oh, and even further past life abductions by Greys.

Eventually, we ended up with the whole "Grey phenomenon" and even old cases being re-written to suggest or state that the entities seen were Greys. Apparently, Adamski indicated that he had seen Greys -I read all of his books and I can tell you that was and is an outright fabrication. A lie. Hopkins, Jacobs et al created the Greys in the 1980s long after Adamski's death in April, 1965.

There is a pattern that you can trace from someone getting interested in UFOs to their "realisation" that they were abductees and that includes investigators such as Dr Leo Sprinkle, Raymond E. Fowler and Dr Karla Turner (her books are amazing as you can follow the progression from just an interest to "I was abducted!"these are text books).

What I keep wondering about is how many people do actually encounter entities, small, large headed or otherwise and do not want to become a Ufology media circus freak?  In fact, if you look at the MUFON page where you can report sightings and encounters entity reports rarely get a follow up. It was a money spinner at one time but now "Disclosure" and all the other grifter claims are far more important -they bring in more money.

The people who went to Hopkins and others (in the UK Flying Saucer Review basically turned hypnosis sessions into "parlour events" with wives and friends attending) probably had encounters but those should be allowed to be recalled naturally unless memories are causing someone such stress that hypnosis will relieve that.  Oh, what were "abductees" have now been renamed "Contactees" because it is more social media friendly.

I would suggest that (and here we are taking the step to accepting that these are genuine encounters) maybe only 1-2% of encounter percipients report what happened. A lot of reports still being cited a genuine incidents can be easily proven to be dream paralysis, altered states and many others were press or Ufologist fake cases and some were not UFO connected. During the 1954 French UFO wave witnesses observed a landed UFO and an entity carrying out repairs. This was in fact known at the time to be a bus driver and a broken down bus (albeit after dark). Clearly meteors, aircraft and other normal things were reported as unexplained. Ufologists such as Jacques Vallee KNOW this but still use those reports to grift on.

What appear to have been genuine accounts went un-investigated and we only have details from newspapers that were confirmed years later. Ufologist angrily stating that journalists got certain details in accounts wrong are laughable -they only decided to get off their asses and investigate some 20-40 years after the event.  Of all the humanoid/Occupant reports on the record it is a shock to say that only 5% (I am being generous) were ever investigated.

Either through using hypnosis or ignoring reports for various reasons ("don't believe them!"/ "I'm not getting involved in that stuff!" or downright prejudice against witnesses due to skin colour) Ufologists have screwed things up. We have lost so much and we are still probably losing much more testimony.  Ufology is not and never was a "scientific study" but has pushed and promoted charlatans, hoaxes and fabricated research to draw in publicity and through that money. 

It is absolutely of vital importance that the accounts from people who see entities by a landed craft or have onboard experiences are recorded. They have to be looked at and investigated with an open but sceptical (NOT debunking) mind. If what they claim is true that is very important and although it may be anecdotal there could be physical evidence associated with encounters that could tell us more.

With reports from the 1950s -2000s going un-investigated we have to remember that once a witness passes that experience/account vanishes.

Yeah, I am preaching to the wind.