Pixels Found On Ivan0135 Skinny Bob Proving CGI Alien Grey Pixelated 3D ...

Notes On: Antonio La Rubia's abduction by robot-like beings and UFO encounter in P...

Notes on La Rubia case

 

We have a case here in which so much happened in such a very small amount of time. I think that this falls into the Alan Godfrey category where a great deal is said to have happened in an impossibly short time. How or why we can’t really say though perhaps tired, bored but La Rubia then slipped into a dream state (this type of instance is well documented in the files).

From talking to such persons, who can recall everything, it is 100% an actual physical experience but in fact is not. When we are dealing with a single percipient we have to be cautious and in this case it seems that a medical and psychological check revealed La Rubia to be healthy and normal -what he was feeling was based in his psyche not reality or would have been detected.

It is an interesting case but only from the psychological point of view. Did anyone check to see whether La Rubia had ever seen a ghost or anything else unusual? After his initial interview was contact kept with him?

I can find no similar entities reported in cases and unless similar can be unearthed and act as corroboration in some way this case is closed.

Why The Case was reappraised: Scoutmaster Sonny DesVergers got burned by a UFO, encounter remembered b...

What the USAF did with the help of Ufologists (amongst then Donald Keyhoe) was "insinuate" that DesVergers was "fond of young boys" -an outright lie and Ufologist after Ufologist pushed this rather than accept a Close Encounter of the Third Kind. 

The USAF and Ufologists carried out a prolonged smear campaign and as Edward J Ruppelt wrote in his book not all the evidence was archived but...uh..."lost" and Ruppelt does NOT come out of this looking good. In fact, it is known that a great deal of evidence and a secret report existed (possibly still does somewhere).

Bad research is bad research. NO ONE knows what happened to DesVergers? He died in 1993 at the age of 70

Why I reappraised the DesVergers case is covered in brief on this blog and in far more detail in my book Beyond UFO Contact: Aliens from Mind, Time and Space

https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2020/11/august-1952-desvergers-case-reappraised.html

************************************************************************

A4

B&W

350 pp

Fully illustrated containing photographs and maps

£20.00

https://www.lulu.com/en/en/shop/terry-hooper/beyond-ufo-contact-aliens-from-mind-time-space/paperback/product-qw8wjm.html?page=1&pageSize=4

Beyond UFO Contact i the fourth book in the groundbreaking series looking at reports of Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien-Entity reports from around the world and reassessing these. In addition there is a look at the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligences (SETI) and its relevance to the UFO phenomenon. 

contents list: 

Introduction: The Path of Counter-Actuality 

1. Dionisio Llanca: Truck Driver, UFO Abductee and Human Guinea Pig 

2. Aliens -What Can We Expect? 

3. The Moreland Incident 

4. It Is All Fake: Ufology Needs To Be Reassessed 

5. Warminster UFOs and Entity Reports 

6. Have Things Changed Since 1977? 

7. The Beausoleil Cas -Even Aliens Like Theatre 

8. The Pwca 

9. Contact...with the Vegetable Alien 

10. The Casitas Dam UFO Photograph and Entity 

11. The Crystal Lake Encounter 

12. The Humanoids at South Riverand the Luczkowich Encounter 

13. Harrison Bailey 

14. Sonny DesVerger 

15. The UFO "Borderline"-The Imjarvi Skiers 

16. Some Interesting Reports to Note 

17. Dead Aliens in Photographs 

18. Ufology, Government Cover Ups and Disclosure 

19. The Reports That You Might Not Want To Look Into 

20. Conil de la Frontera -a Credible Report? 

21. Eighteenth Century Aliens? 

22. Clearview Ranch 

23. The Pat McGuire Case 

24. Piero Fortunato Franzetta 

25. The Silbury Hill Encounter 

26. The Bridge Abduction 

27. The Bagshot Heath UFO Incident 

28. Lurkers and Alien Disinterest 

29. What If YOU See Aliens Land? 

30. So What Would YOU Do If You Encountered A Landed UFO?

Eyewitnesses talk about visitations of giant aliens and other bizarre UF...

Well Worth A Visit For Research or Otherwise: The British UFO Learning Centre

 

Notes on Pascagoula Alien Abduction Case: Exclusive Unseen Video Unveiled | Unexp...

When I posted here that I mainly considered evidence from the time of this event and that Budd Hopkins was a totally discredited person and that I would not accept anything from one of his hypnotic sessions, particularly that did not gel with what we knew and which sparked 'new' memories Philip Mantle came onto the blog and aggressively challenged me.

https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2018/09/pascagoula-and-budd-hopkins.html

 Now remember that I have said that the Pascagoula case is as solid as it gets (but still not proof of aliens) I was surprised by the fact that Mantle was so aggressive. He even questioned my "insulting remarks" about Hopkins which showed that he was very unaware of what was going on within Ufology and abduction 'research' But ever being the diplomat I advised that he watch the videos by Carol Rainey (Hopkins ex wife) and look at specific threads online. 

I was overly polite and suggested that he send me anything new for the archives and I was willing to chat with him to clear things up. Nothing. He deleted his comment a day later. 

I had no idea he was writing a book so he obviously saw my remarks as a threat to sales whereas with thousands of views a week it might have helped sales! 

Really I can see no reason why British Ufologists act this way. If a genuine incident took place that is not private property for one person to keep and never let anyone else know. I have been involved with UFOs since 1974. From 1977-2015 (and occasionally since) I was a UK police forces exotic animals expert consultant. In 50 years I have never given out a name or confidential information (which would have made me a lot of money if I had) even when witnesses have gone public themselves. I have a very strict code of practice.

I always get suspicious when people start getting overly defensive and are not willing to share research data -sharing data is what researchers do and I have in the past (though I was ripped off by four very well known UK Ufologists who decided they had my data but then could not share theirs with me). Despite what a couple people wrote on a UFO chat site (no idea which and I don't care about these sites) I have nothing against Mantle. He seems a nice enough person.

UFOs -funny old business

61-yr-old woman saw a landed UFO with occupants, experienced missing tim...

Two British experiencers and John E. Mack talk about the alien abduction...

“The Repton Shrubs Encounter and More” | Paranormal Stories My Notes on the Repton Report

The Repton Woods incident I looked into and even chatted with Omar (I knew him since the 1970s) about it. The report was anonymous and the alleged witness was not contactable.

Was it a hoax report? Possibly.

Can the creature be explained? Yes. a fox on its hind legs -ready to pounce on prey?- and with a wet back giving it the odd look. Omar said he had an open mind but to me this was either a hoax or misidentification. Appeals for the witness to come forward never received a response.

Are there good "solid" cases ?

 I have written four books solely dealing with the much ignored aspect of UFOs -Close Encounters of the Third Kind and alien Entity encounters - UFO Contact? Looking at the Evidence for Alien Visitation, Unidentified - Identified: UFO Crashes & Alien Entity Encounters, Contact! Encounters With Extra Terrestrial Entities? and Beyond UFO Contact -Aliens from Mind, Time and Space.  My previous three books Some Things Strange and Sinister and Some More Things Strange and Sinister and Pursuing The Strange & Weird -A Naturalist's Viewpoint also included chapters on such cases.

To add to this I published five issues of The Anomalous Observational Phenomena (AOP) Journal and these dealt with little known or some original cases of CE3K/AE. By all accounts, if I go by feedback from people who have read them, they were "groundbreaking" and "a fresh breath of air sorting fact from fiction" and so on and so forth (I'll not use any more quotes as that would be rather egotistical).

Each book is thoroughly researched and sources are fully listed and images -sketches, photos, maps etc- are ones most people have not seen before or were considered "no longer existing" or "lost" and the clue here as to how I found them is that I carry out research -original research and do not cut and paste like most modern authors. 

So, with an estimated (by someone who looked through all my social media to get post view stats etc) 1 million views of posts on the books why are they not selling? Yes, people today do not read and get most of their fake 'facts' from the internet (where bloggers happily use my clearly copyrighted illustrations without credit) and You Tube. Even up to the mid 1990s before the internet really kicked in books like these as well as, say, John Hanson's Haunted Skies UFO history books (very unique) would have sold like  crazy. Not any more it seems.

One problem may be that certain factions in Ufology have painted me as a debunker and some even state buying my books would be a waste of money. These comments come from people I can 100% guarantee have only ever seen the cover of one of my books online and I know (I am the seller after all) that they have never purchased a copy of any of the books or AOP Journals. What is going on?

Firstly, these people have a vested interest in putting down other authors because they want people to keep buying their books.  Secondly, in Ufology you either "believe" in UFOs or "Disbelieve" and that is certainly not scientific principles at work. It is a case of looking at the case reports then looking at the debunkers then pro supporters of cases and I made no secret of the fact that with UFO Contact? I decided that once and for all I would totally destroy/explain away CE3K events and then I could retire after decades of studying that aspect -comi9ng up to 50 years now that should give a clue here as to what happened.

I took a world-wide look at cases since this is a world-wide phenomenon and not just confined to the United States! I decided to go through my archives and re-assess reports. I found that I could grade them by various criteria such as single witness, single witness with third party back-up, multiple witnesses and multiple witnesses with back up independent testimony. Then there were other aspects that required more evidence such as physical traces -not necessarily a guarantee that a UFO seen was a "craft" but based on the percipients' there would seem to be no other explanation. 

I have noted this before but if a single witness claims an encounter with a UFO and entities it can be explained away (and the people involved are NOT mad). But if you have a single percipient in the countryside who has a "brief" encounter but that is unknown to people witnessing a "UFO" shooting off from that encounter area then that is secondary back up. If the percipient is found by someone and has collapsed and suffers "mental shock" and physiological after effects then you have to explain all of this away.

Now, say you have three people in a car driving along a rural road at night after a pleasant evening out and they are suddenly chased by a "UFO"; they lose time and afterwards exhibit mild radiation poisoning, post traumatic stress and much more how do you exp-lain that? If someone (or several persons)  unconnected with those three people report UFOs over the area and even spotting a car (that of the percipients and before the case was even known about)  being chased by a UFO how do you explain that all away?

People do not take casual walks in the countryside or through forests and end up with amnesia, eye damage and radiation sickness -and when the nearest nuclear facility (if there is one in the country itself) is hundreds of miles away how do you explain it away?

There are cases that can be explained away and that can be done without resorting to claims by debunkers who fake things as much as Ufologists do. I did check the debunking claims in some cases and one after another they fell apart when it was proven that facts had been twisted, omitted or fake aspects added. 

Here is the thing that people do not like. You HAVE to either say "aliens!" or jump into the camp of fakers like Jacques Vallee and his followers and claim interdimensional or fairy folk origins. They use a non fact -dimensions and the multiverse have not been scientifically proven so are convenient to use as people assume they have been proven. Or you can claim "It's all bunk!" 

I have been asked about my opinion on the origin of the seemingly constructed craft? Well, as an historian I know that nothing like them was built by humans and certainly not in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s or later. 

So they are alien, right? Here's where I annoy people. Even with all of the physical evidence and testimony  that cannot be said. Percipient testimony as well as that by others is "anecdotal evidence" (in the past in criminal cases that caused more than a few people to be wrongly imprisoned or executed). Physical traces and radiation sickness etc cannot be explained away but it is still not proof of alien visitation. I have to remain open minded and study the facts and investigate so whatever I may think or feel has no relevance: I present the facts and if a case passes all of the checks and investigations then it has a high credibility rating but each reader has to decide for themselves and it is not my place to tell anyone what to think.

This is a world-wide phenomenon and I think that I have satisfactorily shown that so called "UFO waves" are anything but -they consist of natural phenomena, misidentifications, genuine unknows and more -Ufology has failed to investigate 97% of UFO reports or CE3K reports since 1947 and personal biases affect those they do investigate.

So which of the "classic" cases passed the checks? Are there good "solid" cases from outside the United States? Well, the answer to the second question is definitely "yes there are". The answer to the first question: buy the book(s) and see -before they are withdrawn in 2024 and will only be found in archives after that.

It all depends whether you think independently to form your own opinion based on evidence. Never listen to rumours from people who have never read the books they criticise!