https://www.facebook.com/groups/2463400933890105
Sunday, 27 August 2023
Tuesday, 22 August 2023
CE3K/AEs and Why Ufology is NOT a Science and never will be.
Let me be very clear about something as it is very important and shows why current and past Ufology was very -very- far from a "science" and why that will never change.
Firstly, while the flying saucer believers of the late 1940s and when they got more organised into clubs in the 1950s, accepted that things whizzing about the sky in daylight and at night were very likely from an extra-terrestrial source they were unwilling to listen to reports of landings and encounters.
With an exception: tall, blonde-haired, blue-eyed Venusians, Saturnians, Uranians and so on. The contactees were the ones spreading the st6ories of visiting "space brothers" and in many cases just reading the accounts showed that they really did not make much sense. There is a big clue in the descriptions of these "space brothers" as well as some of the books, papers and magazines from the 1950s and 1960s that looked down at the "lessers" like Jews and black people. It is no secret if you look into it that contactee organisations were run by right wing, white and quite racist people. It is interesting that those involved in flying saucer 'investigation' promoted these groups that were very unscientific.
There were people who genuinely believed that they had been in contact with space brothers and there were those who found that such accounts could be big earners. Money they found was more interesting than the truth.
Of course for flying saucer groups and the rapidly growing lecture circuit there was no better draw than a contactee and one of the biggest hoaxers was George Adamski who got to travel the world, treated like a celebrity and, of course, "not earning a penny" because this was all about spreading the words of our "space brothers". George Adamski (who 100% was NOT a professor) managed to link up with Flying Saucer review editor Desmond Leslie who was not beyond adding the odd fictional story into FSR. It was Leslie who backed up Adamski's claim of having no navel. Interesting as prior to one 1950s UK event Adamski had to change but with his back to one of the organisers -but the reflection from a mirror near Adamski showed that he did most definitely have a navel.
Leslie and Adamski wrote The Flying Saucers Have Landed in which many historical cases of meteorites, comets, etc suddenly become "manoeuvring disc shaped objects" and all of those reports can be checked at the source and I did so in 1980 and immediately binned the book as being useful for nothing.
Adamski is still hailed by many today in 'scientific' Ufology as genuine -some trying to be vague so as to provide themselves a "get out of gaol" clause "in case".
Contactees were accepted as they pulled in the punters -paying bums on seats and that is what flying saucer and UFO groups wanted. Even in the late 1970s I was chastised at a meeting of the British Flying Saucer Bureau for "speaking ill of Mr. Adamski" while my interest in reports such as those of Betty and Barney Hill were dismissed as "silly stories" (in the Hills case of course it was a "mixed race" couple which offended a few even though both were quite human and no other unknown race was involved). At a talk I was invited to give at the BFSB I was interrupted several times by senior members with "But we know of course from Mr Adamski's account that" and "which is hard to accept as Mr Adamski quite clearly described those people (aliens) he met".
Ufology has always jumped on the band wagon that generates the most cash. Contactees then, as digital cameras emerged, "orbs" and "rods" -all naturally explainable but that type of thing made money and drew people in to talks. The paranormal and UFOs, Bigfoot and UFOs -all these emerging at times when TV or movies promoted paranormal programmes and Bigfoot documentaries. The Spielberg movie, Close Encounters of the Third Kind was a major money-spinner for UFO groups.
Then things waned until Budd Hopkins introduced the false abduction scenario in the early 1980s and that took off. Money was raked in by all sides and then people wanting in on the cash flow started digging out "alien implants" and much more. Those people got in on the lecture circuit and TV gravy train. Every UFO sighting was an alien abduction of a human being no questio9ning allowed. Every pre 1980s CE3K/Entity case was then rebooted to involve "The Greys" including the account of the Hills. People observing a UFO landing and entities that lasted a couple of minutes -they looked at their watches or clocks- were dismissed unless they were willing to accept they had been abducted and undergo hypnosis.
Of course, when the decades of money from abductions started dwindling the 'researchers' sold off private percipient information and even MUFON sold such material (to Robert Bigelow) and big scandals that were washed over by those wanting to keep fat wallets full.
We know that in the United States NICAP (headed by a well known racist, Donald E. Keyhoe) was infiltrated by the CIA. In fact NICAP actively recruited ex intelligence people into top positions so the question is whether this was infiltration or taking over through invitation. Either way Keyhoe lost no money and still had book deals and TV work.
https://terryhooper.blogspot.com/2022/10/donald-keyhoe-and-nicap-counter.html
Look at how the USAF Office of Special Investigation and its main agent, Richard Doty, infiltrated Ufology. It bribed and gave William Moore false information to feed Ufology and it is also rumoured that among the other "prominent Ufologists" Doty gave false info to and also paid were Hopkins and Leonard H Stringfield who told a colleague of mine that his source was in the AFOSI. Doty even helped drive one person, Paul Bennewitz insane. Doty was outed decades ago and was observed talking to Hopkins, David Jacobs and even Vallee at UFO conventions. Conventions where rather than being asked to leave or being a target of verbal abuse he is welcomed and given free reign and allowed to "spill the beans" to those interested.
https://terryhooper.blogspot.com/2022/10/crashed-ufos-counter-intelligence-and.html
How is this all possible? Because Ufology is not and never was a science although it did and does attract scientists to it based on data rather than a belief. Investigation by such scientists soon turn up the truth: the Vallee catalogue of UFO landings involve known hoaxes, weather phenomena and reports never investigated just taken from an odd news item. The Phillips Physical Trace Catalogue, from what can be found -ditto as with Vallee. Ufology itself has not turned out any truly scientific evidence in documents that can be peer reviewed by scientists. Scientists who do ask to see such material are asked "Paying by cheque or card?"
Again, and I have stated this in writing numerous times, although anecdotal (anecdotal evidence is still acceptable to build up a data base) there are still highly rated CE3K events. Looking at my archive only around 2% of all the cases from 1947-2000 were looked into. Major incidents were ignored based on percipients/witnesses being black, single females and even "too far to travel" (within the state) -prejudices and almost a need to not want to believe that there might be living(?) entities in the objects they are supposed to be trying to get to the truth of and find answers -all play a part. 1973 saw a peak in reports and in one short space of time, around the date of the Pascagouls incident, encounters were ignored because those involved were black -the same investigators who flatly refused to look into these cases were willing to travel all across the state for a LITS (Light In The Sky) report when it came from a white person.
Another thing to note is that the UFO Wave is almost certainly a fiction. The 1954 UFO Wave was a mix of misidentifications, newspaper hoaxes and other factors. There were what appear to be genuine incidents but there were not "thousands of "genuine, investigated and documented UFO sightings". Note; that some Italian and French investigators who did look into reports some 35, 40 and 50 years after the event, were quite angry that journalists had got details wrong. They were journalists out to sell newspapers not carry out scientific investigations...that was supposedly the Ufologists job? Even today there are those who are in Ufology "intellectual elite" who openly state that they do all their investigations sat in a comfortable chair and by reading news items and based their findings on those. Why has Ufology not proven UFO reality?
The 1973 "World wide UFO wave" can be seen as per 1954. In fact, a peak(s) in CE3K incidents do not occur in those years but, of course, Ufologists do not notice this obvious fact because there are only the Hills, Walton, Pascagoula CE3Ks...right? All of this means that UFOs are not flying across the sky by the thousands each year but are rarer than is thought -Ufology has created a myth that it pushes as factual such as Thomas Mantell having been shot down while fling a jet by a UFO. Never happened. Roswell and the 65 UFO crashes that I listed before giving up -never happened.
https://terryhooper.blogspot.com/2022/12/check-facts-do-not-be-deceived.html
And we know that British Ufologists from the 1970s on faked UFO incidents -sightings and encounters- and were caught out at a UFO conference. No push-back from Ufology and they have never stated which reports were faked or for what reason meaning that from the 1970s on all UFO reports are marked as "dubious" unless personally investigated.
Fraudsters are running Ufology and people have no problem with that. Why hear the truth when fantasy is more Dr Who or X Files orientated and fun? Look at the 'genuine' interest in these reports -my books do not sell because they are not sensationalist lies. The UFO history series of books Haunted Skies I cannot recommend enough but sales are hardly there. Why? Because they are not published in an era where people want to learn and educate themselves with facts.
I have spent from 1974 looking at these reports and it is depressing to see that some are simply 2-4 lines from a newspaper and that is it. Ufology has also been very good at sweeping good reports under the carpet because they do not fit in with the prevailing crowd. This is why individuals get more done because they are not jumping on the money wagon -which is how you make money in Ufology.
Ufology is NOT a Science and never will be.
Monday, 21 August 2023
Notes On: Antonio La Rubia's abduction by robot-like beings and UFO encounter in P...
Notes on La Rubia case
We have a case here in which so much happened in such a very small amount of time. I think that this falls into the Alan Godfrey category where a great deal is said to have happened in an impossibly short time. How or why we can’t really say though perhaps tired, bored but La Rubia then slipped into a dream state (this type of instance is well documented in the files).
From talking to such persons, who can recall everything, it is 100% an actual physical experience but in fact is not. When we are dealing with a single percipient we have to be cautious and in this case it seems that a medical and psychological check revealed La Rubia to be healthy and normal -what he was feeling was based in his psyche not reality or would have been detected.
It is an interesting case but only from the psychological point of view. Did anyone check to see whether La Rubia had ever seen a ghost or anything else unusual? After his initial interview was contact kept with him?
I can find no similar entities reported in cases and unless similar can be unearthed and act as corroboration in some way this case is closed.
Sunday, 20 August 2023
Why The Case was reappraised: Scoutmaster Sonny DesVergers got burned by a UFO, encounter remembered b...
What the USAF did with the help of Ufologists (amongst then Donald Keyhoe) was "insinuate" that DesVergers was "fond of young boys" -an outright lie and Ufologist after Ufologist pushed this rather than accept a Close Encounter of the Third Kind.
The USAF and Ufologists carried out a prolonged smear campaign and as Edward J Ruppelt wrote in his book not all the evidence was archived but...uh..."lost" and Ruppelt does NOT come out of this looking good. In fact, it is known that a great deal of evidence and a secret report existed (possibly still does somewhere).
Bad research is bad research. NO ONE knows what happened to DesVergers? He died in 1993 at the age of 70
Why I reappraised the DesVergers case is covered in brief on this blog and in far more detail in my book Beyond UFO Contact: Aliens from Mind, Time and Space
************************************************************************
A4
B&W
350 pp
Fully illustrated containing photographs and maps
£20.00
Beyond UFO Contact i the fourth book in the groundbreaking series looking at reports of Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Alien-Entity reports from around the world and reassessing these. In addition there is a look at the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligences (SETI) and its relevance to the UFO phenomenon.
contents list:
Introduction: The Path of Counter-Actuality
1. Dionisio Llanca: Truck Driver, UFO Abductee and Human Guinea Pig
2. Aliens -What Can We Expect?
3. The Moreland Incident
4. It Is All Fake: Ufology Needs To Be Reassessed
5. Warminster UFOs and Entity Reports
6. Have Things Changed Since 1977?
7. The Beausoleil Cas -Even Aliens Like Theatre
8. The Pwca
9. Contact...with the Vegetable Alien
10. The Casitas Dam UFO Photograph and Entity
11. The Crystal Lake Encounter
12. The Humanoids at South Riverand the Luczkowich Encounter
13. Harrison Bailey
14. Sonny DesVerger
15. The UFO "Borderline"-The Imjarvi Skiers
16. Some Interesting Reports to Note
17. Dead Aliens in Photographs
18. Ufology, Government Cover Ups and Disclosure
19. The Reports That You Might Not Want To Look Into
20. Conil de la Frontera -a Credible Report?
21. Eighteenth Century Aliens?
22. Clearview Ranch
23. The Pat McGuire Case
24. Piero Fortunato Franzetta
25. The Silbury Hill Encounter
26. The Bridge Abduction
27. The Bagshot Heath UFO Incident
28. Lurkers and Alien Disinterest
29. What If YOU See Aliens Land?
30. So What Would YOU Do If You Encountered A Landed UFO?
Friday, 18 August 2023
Wednesday, 16 August 2023
Notes on Pascagoula Alien Abduction Case: Exclusive Unseen Video Unveiled | Unexp...
When I posted here that I mainly considered evidence from the time of this event and that Budd Hopkins was a totally discredited person and that I would not accept anything from one of his hypnotic sessions, particularly that did not gel with what we knew and which sparked 'new' memories Philip Mantle came onto the blog and aggressively challenged me.
Now remember that I have said that the Pascagoula case is as solid as it gets (but still not proof of aliens) I was surprised by the fact that Mantle was so aggressive. He even questioned my "insulting remarks" about Hopkins which showed that he was very unaware of what was going on within Ufology and abduction 'research' But ever being the diplomat I advised that he watch the videos by Carol Rainey (Hopkins ex wife) and look at specific threads online.
I was overly polite and suggested that he send me anything new for the archives and I was willing to chat with him to clear things up. Nothing. He deleted his comment a day later.
I had no idea he was writing a book so he obviously saw my remarks as a threat to sales whereas with thousands of views a week it might have helped sales!
Really I can see no reason why British Ufologists act this way. If a genuine incident took place that is not private property for one person to keep and never let anyone else know. I have been involved with UFOs since 1974. From 1977-2015 (and occasionally since) I was a UK police forces exotic animals expert consultant. In 50 years I have never given out a name or confidential information (which would have made me a lot of money if I had) even when witnesses have gone public themselves. I have a very strict code of practice.
I always get suspicious when people start getting overly defensive and are not willing to share research data -sharing data is what researchers do and I have in the past (though I was ripped off by four very well known UK Ufologists who decided they had my data but then could not share theirs with me). Despite what a couple people wrote on a UFO chat site (no idea which and I don't care about these sites) I have nothing against Mantle. He seems a nice enough person.
UFOs -funny old business
Monday, 14 August 2023
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
"Flying Saucer Review created the term Humanoid"
The Humanoids was an October-November 1966 special issue published by Flying Saucer Review. It was later released in book form. Why do I me...
-
I have to say that I had thought European UFO groups might be far more cooperative than those in the United States where there is no interes... -
I know of a Spanish Ufologist who was once 100% behind UFO reality and the possibility that the origins were extraterrestrial. He now dec...
