Just a Note

I just spent two hours writing a lengthy post as a follow up to the last one and my laptop then shifted to another page altogether.

Lengthy post lost.

Sadly, with a rapidly dying laptop and no book sales it seems pointless trying to even attempt lengthier posts.

If anyone wishes to contact me they should go to the AOP or AE CE3K face book pages and message me there.

Charles I. Halt (b. 1939) is a retired United States Air Force colonel and a former deputy base commander of RAF Bentwaters, near Woodbridge, Suffolk. After serving in Vietnam, Japan and Korea, he was assigned to Bentwaters as deputy commander. The Rendlesham Forest incident of late December 1980 occurred shortly afterwards, and he was an important witness to events on the second night of sightings.

Why do I mention this?

Look who has my book  -Charles I Halt

530 pages

illustrated with maps, photographs and more

A4 format

B&W

Paperback: List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/ufo-contact/paperback/product-23719040.html

Since 1947 it has been claimed that UFOs/flying saucers are evidence of aliens visiting the Earth.  Since the 1950s claims of encounters with landed craft and alien beings were talked about but not taken seriously.

In the 1960s the subject of UFO abduction was a "slow-burner" until the whole "Grey" abduction phenomenon and claims made by researchers such as Budd Hopkins, Prof. John Mack and Dr David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber.

But is there evidence to back up any of the claims -and what about those encountering Alien Entities but who were not abducted?

Are these people all hoaxers, psychotic or suffering from some other mental illness as some claim?

Are those people who were exposed by Ufologists against their wishes, people who wanted to report what happened and then just get back to their everyday lives -thrust into the media glare against their will?

And if US authorities were so interested that in one case at least they broke into the home of two abductees and this was later proven -why?

Why did a hard core of these people never want publicity or to make money from what happened to them?

Above all, why did a major UFO landing incident take place on a US Inbterstate road in front of a large number of observers (all willing to talk to investigators) never get investigated? If it were not for a radio presenter interviewing and taking notes we would know nothing of the case -it would be labelled "insubstantial".

James and Coral Lorensen -the Scopolamine Kids; using a very notorious "truth drug" on alleged UFO witnesses and selling stories to newspapers.  An investigator (a veteran) showing a witness images of "aliens" encountered in other cases before any memories were retrieved.  Worst of all, the constant "pissing competition" and breaches of trust between UFO investigators.

2017 is the time to assess the past evidence and look at the faults within Ufology.

Not everyone is going to be happy -debunkers or ufologists.

Praised by Dr Mark Rodheiger of the Centre for UFO Studies and, below, John Hanson of the Haunted Skies Project and Colonel Charles Halt the officer involved in the Rendlesham incident.

 

Smaller format version:Pages 530 Binding Perfect Bound Paperback Interior Black ink &white  Weight 1.05kg  Size 18.9 x24.59cm£18.00
http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/high-strangeness/paperback/product-23822248.html

Second Book in the series

220 pages

A4

perfect bound

paperback

Fully illustrated with photographs and illustrations

List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days
http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooper-scharf/unidentified-identified/paperback/product-23799953.html

The follow up to the comprehensive book "UFO Contact?"

The Author spent 1974 to 2018 specializing in the investigation and research of Close Encounters of the Third Kind (CE3K) and alien entity cases; the former involving an Unidentified Flying Object and the latter, apparently, involving none.

Previously unreported cases as well as 'lost' cases are looked at as well as the possibility that some percients suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome after their encounters.

A must read for those with a serious interest in UFOs

Some of the contents:
 The Nottinghamshire UFO Crash of 1987…or 1988                                   
 The Llandrillo ‘Saucer’ and Berwyn Mountains ‘UFO’ Crash Retrieval 
 Strange Pennsylvania Entity Encounter                                                        
 UFO Abductees and Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome                             
 The UFO That Landed On A US Highway                                                   
 My Encounters With The Men In Black                                                        
 A Previously Un-noted Alien Entity Type                                                   

 Early 20th Century UK Close Encounters of the Third Kind                     
 Close Encounter with a Boggart                                                                      
 Some Odd and Unusual Cases                                                                       
 Rosa Lotti and the Happy Entities                                                                
 The Strange Case of the Woollaton Gnomes and the Mince-pie Martians
 What Happened on the Isle of Wight and at Felixstowe?                           
 The ‘Lost’ Belgian UFO Landing Case                                                      
 Strange Aliens from Outer Space?                                                             

 Encounter with Black Aliens and Landed UFO                                         

 Preliminary UK CE3K/Alien Entity Catalogue 


Third Book in the Series
These cover everything from UFOs and Close Encounters of the Third Kind to encounters with unidentified humanoid creatures, ghosts, poltergeists, mysterious and unidentified creatures at sea, on land as well as bizarre carcasses washed ashore.  Loch Ness, Sasquatch, previously thought lost photographs of a city in the sky and others.

And if you want to concentrate solely on alleged alien abductions or encounters then UFO Contact? (receiving some praise from the Centre for UFO Studies) and the follow up, Unidentified-Identified are the books you need

Contact! Encounters With Extra Terrestrial Entities?

Format  A4

370pp

Black & white

Profusely illustrated

£15.00 SPECIAL PRICE

The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) says that we may have to wait many thousands of years before any signals sent gets a response if they are detected.

The real SETI may already have established the there is alien life –and it has been visiting Earth for at least 70 years.

Once the mass of reports of 

Close Encounters of the Third Kind and entity encounters are sifted there remains a strong core of cases that defy logical explanation and suggest that these encounters have resulted in physiological effects and post traumatic stress.

Terry Hooper-Scharf of the CE3K/AE Project has led research into these reports for over 40 years and in this work takes a look at rare or obscure reports as well as cataloguing encounters from Germany and Portugal and focuses in on correlations in the reports and how the Dandenong (Kelly Cahill) encounter could be the best case ever reported.

Have the serious investigators and researchers looking into UFOs been unearthing better evidence of extra terrestrial life and contact with humans than established SETI ?

"Our investigators are all scientifically based..."

I have, for several months now, been trying to find UFO 'investigators' in the United States (particularly in Mississippi) but it seems that none are interested in re-opening and looking into old cases that have barely been looked at.

There was a peak of initial interest from two who asked "Is this for a TV show as I'm sure I could make time?"  On the response "No TV show" was involved....interest was lost.

I am sorry to say that this seems to prove that there is no real interest in scientific study or investigation amongst ufologists.  This is the very reason why persons in more established sciences (people in glass houses should not throw sticks) can simply dismiss "ufology".

The folder I am holding in the photograph is far from complete a catalogue but covers reports from the United States from 1971-1974 which is a period that saw a surge of good reports that were either "investigated by newspaper clipping" or at a very low level.

After over four decades every time I hear a MUFON promoter or ufologist utter the words "Our investigators are all scientifically based and we gave data and investigate to the degree of police crime investigations" I now yell out "Bovine excrement!"  It is an utter and outright lie.

Face it, from 1947 onward all ufology has achieved is to isolate itself from science and authorities and to turn the investigation into a money maker for certain frauds.

"Flying saucer enthusiasts" NOT "Ufology" (and pretending it is a science)

Why this is The ONLY UFO Books You Will Ever Need

Charles I. Halt (b. 1939) is a retired United States Air Force colonel and a former deputy base commander of RAF Bentwaters, near Woodbridge, Suffolk. After serving in Vietnam, Japan and Korea, he was assigned to Bentwaters as deputy commander. The Rendlesham Forest incident of late December 1980 occurred shortly afterwards, and he was an important witness to events on the second night of sightings.

Why do I mention this?
Look who has my book  -Charles I Halt

530 pages

illustrated with maps, photographs and more

A4 format

B&W

Paperback: List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/ufo-contact/paperback/product-23719040.html

Since 1947 it has been claimed that UFOs/flying saucers are evidence of aliens visiting the Earth.  Since the 1950s claims of encounters with landed craft and alien beings were talked about but not taken seriously.

In the 1960s the subject of UFO abduction was a "slow-burner" until the whole "Grey" abduction phenomenon and claims made by researchers such as Budd Hopkins, Prof. John Mack and Dr David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber.

But is there evidence to back up any of the claims -and what about those encountering Alien Entities but who were not abducted?

Are these people all hoaxers, psychotic or suffering from some other mental illness as some claim?

Are those people who were exposed by Ufologists against their wishes, people who wanted to report what happened and then just get back to their everyday lives -thrust into the media glare against their will?

And if US authorities were so interested that in one case at least they broke into the home of two abductees and this was later proven -why?

Why did a hard core of these people never want publicity or to make money from what happened to them?

Above all, why did a major UFO landing incident take place on a US Inbterstate road in front of a large number of observers (all willing to talk to investigators) never get investigated? If it were not for a radio presenter interviewing and taking notes we would know nothing of the case -it would be labelled "insubstantial".

James and Coral Lorensen -the Scopolamine Kids; using a very notorious "truth drug" on alleged UFO witnesses and selling stories to newspapers.  An investigator (a veteran) showing a witness images of "aliens" encountered in other cases before any memories were retrieved.  Worst of all, the constant "pissing competition" and breaches of trust between UFO investigators.

2017 is the time to assess the past evidence and look at the faults within Ufology.

Not everyone is going to be happy -debunkers or ufologists.

Praised by Dr Mark Rodheiger of the Centre for UFO Studies and, below, John Hanson of the Haunted Skies Project and Colonel Charles Halt the officer involved in the Rendlesham incident.

It Will Fall On Deaf Ears But....

The Kathy Reeves or "Reeves farm" case from the 1960s has a special significance in that we know a few things about the case but the ufologists totally and utterly dropped the ball.  In fact, later writers and (lords help us) cryptozoologists have reported on it and given out so much erroneous detail that it took a long time to sort the mess out.

The reason for all of the ufological and cryptozoological bilge is simple -and I need to point out that ufologiosts in Europe and the UK are equally as guilty of this- they 'investigated' by newspaper clippings. Even the Centre for UFO Studies had only basic details until I updated their files in 2018.

The Reeves family, of course, moved and from that point on because 'lost' to us.

Yet we have a farm that had strange creatures sightings, UFO landings and multiple witnesses and no one could really be bothered because actually investigating meant spending time and energy -better to just collect newsclippings.

There are similar cases but the thing to note here is that the Reeves escaped the various dubious attentions of the ufologists and in particular the Scapolamene Kids -Jim and Coral Lorensen. The family just experienced the strange and weird and moved on into anonymity.

Lyndia, Linda or Lindia Morel -depending on who you read but most us Lyndia- had a number of Ufologists involved in her case such as Walter Webb, Hans Holzer and so on and despite the use of hypnopsis we still know as little about the case today as we did in 1973.  Morel passed Betty Hill's "litmus test" by telling her something about her case that Betty had never revealed about her own. Of course, not knowing what that was makes it meaningless to us.  But Morel had a name changed and moved town and so was another lucky escapee of dubious ufologists attention.

In the mid 1970s there were incidents reported from a Colorado Ranch (that took 24 pages of various APRO Bulletins to report on) that immediately bring to mind the dubious Skin Walker Ranch and equally dubious Marley Woods -UFOs and UFO landings, cattle mutilations, Bigfoot, CE3Ks -the works.  But the report in the APRO Bulletin seems to be where everything stops. I have been in touch with Dr Leo Sprinkle recently over this matter.  Certainly the book by the ranch owners that was supposed to reveal everything never appeared -there are some today who have now given up the search.  I am preparing a report.

The Mississippi Case -fully reported on in UFO Contact? has been auspicious in that no US UFO 'investigation' group or investigator -I use the term very loosely- has had any interest in re-opening this 1973 case in which multiple witnesses observed two UFOs -one landed- on a US Highway and one group reported it immediately to a local radio station.  Despite Ted Bloecher's appeal to the two local 'investigators' they stuck their noses into any case but this local one. I stated that, perhaps, the hair of the observers was not straight enough.  I think it fair to say that the 'investigators' displayed a high degree of racism in not talking to the witnesses or venturing near their homes as it was "a black neighborhood". 

Therefore, I will be trying to look into the report while some of the witnesses are, I hope, still alive.

I would urge any really serious UFO researcher who can to look into old pre-1980's CE3K or Entity incidents whether in the United States, Australia, Africa or Europe as most were just "investigated by newsclipping" and that means we may have lost a lot of valuable research material and evidence through ignorance and prejudice toward this type of report.

530 pages

illustrated with maps, photographs and more

A4 format

B&W

Paperback: List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/ufo-contact/paperback/product-23719040.html

Since 1947 it has been claimed that UFOs/flying saucers are evidence of aliens visiting the Earth.  Since the 1950s claims of encounters with landed craft and alien beings were talked about but not taken seriously.

In the 1960s the subject of UFO abduction was a "slow-burner" until the whole "Grey" abduction phenomenon and claims made by researchers such as Budd Hopkins, Prof. John Mack and Dr David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber.

But is there evidence to back up any of the claims -and what about those encountering Alien Entities but who were not abducted?

Are these people all hoaxers, psychotic or suffering from some other mental illness as some claim?

Are those people who were exposed by Ufologists against their wishes, people who wanted to report what happened and then just get back to their everyday lives -thrust into the media glare against their will?

And if US authorities were so interested that in one case at least they broke into the home of two abductees and this was later proven -why?

Why did a hard core of these people never want publicity or to make money from what happened to them?

Above all, why did a major UFO landing incident take place on a US Inbterstate road in front of a large number of observers (all willing to talk to investigators) never get investigated? If it were not for a radio presenter interviewing and taking notes we would know nothing of the case -it would be labelled "insubstantial".

James and Coral Lorensen -the Scopolamine Kids; using a very notorious "truth drug" on alleged UFO witnesses and selling stories to newspapers.  An investigator (a veteran) showing a witness images of "aliens" encountered in other cases before any memories were retrieved.  Worst of all, the constant "pissing competition" and breaches of trust between UFO investigators.

2017 is the time to assess the past evidence and look at the faults within Ufology.

Not everyone is going to be happy -debunkers or ufologists.

Praised by Dr Mark Rodheiger of the Centre for UFO Studies and, below, John Hanson of the Haunted Skies Project and Colonel Charles Halt the officer involved in the Rendlesham incident.

With so many enemies I guess I've made it in the world!

I find it rather interesting being the target of attempts to discredit me.  Cryptozoologists have faked at least six "big cat" reports -all forwarded to me anonymously- and all based in Devon.  I say no more.

Then we have the ghost hunters and "paranormalists" who cite my debunking of poltergeists -as any reader of my books or this blog will know I have seen poltergeist type activity with my own eyes and only when there are known hoaxers at work would I debunk.  I think those involved with the paranormal are missing the biggest explanation for 90% of 'ghost' sightings.

Then we have the Ufologists -both sat in their arm chairs collecting news-clippings and drawing conclusions based on some of the worst reporting around and those who have no idea what investigation and research means.  Aurora UFO crash -VERY WELL KNOWN HOAX but money spinner. Roswell -a fake story that was only picked up on in the late 1970s since which time at least 32,000 "sworn to silence" witnesses have come forward (I was being sarcastic with that 32,000 figure by the way). I could go on but the point I have made many, many times is that these pei=ople are ignoring genuine reports and accepting based on dubious eviodence the whole "greys abduction agenda".

I have, apparently, and that shows they have not read this blog nor any of my books, never come up with a single piece of credible evidence to discredit the abduction research of Hopkins or Jacobs. I have actually given plenty. Search the blog. But for Hopkins:

https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-two-major-players-of-budd-hopkins.html

https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2018/10/a-key-witness-in-linda-cortile-ufo.html

https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2018/10/1996-symbols-revealed-as-evidence-of.html

https://aeceiiikp.blogspot.com/2018/10/1996-budd-hopkins-hears-of-new-danger.html

These four videos completely shred Hopkins' work while Jacobs' own words and behaviour shreds his. This is not an "earn a quick buck" game but a subject that should be treated as serious and of great importance -hence my disbelief and disgust that Ufologists and MUFON in particular will not re-open investigations into at least two major UFO Entity events with multiple witnesses.

They have the finances to carry out this work whereas I do not but still try my utmost.

So when I am told that bands of fakers and frauds such as cryptozoologists, ufologists and "paranormalists" are trying to feed me hoax reports and attack my credibility I have to respond with "so what?"  And believe me, I have had the debunkers -the real ones- try to discredit me.

With so many enemies I guess I've made it in the world!

Still Available

I suspended publishing 2 and 3 since after 8 months or so not a single copy has sold,

But....

KATHLEEN MARDEN: The MUFON Experiencer Survey

"...We did not have the large amounts of money that were available to people like the Budd Hopkins and John Mack and David Jacobs had through Robert Bigelow"

BOOM!

Suddenly we realise WHY it was important for Hopkins and Mack to get the right results. We KNOW Hopkins "stacked the deck" to get the right results. Was this because that would be necessary to convince Bigelow to continue the much needed funding?  This has always been a very common problem with research groups at universities and private bodies who receive financial backing but they are expected to yield results to justify the financial backing.

We need to also remember that "published their work in peer review journals such as the MUFON Journal" is not peer review. The data has to be presented and that includes full transcripts, taped interviews, video taped interviews and all unedited. Everything has to be available and "I cut 20 minutes from the tape here as it was not really necessary" is a real cause for concern.

Every time I asked those involved or those associated with this line of work how it was being financed I was told "out of their own pocket".  Right up until 2017 that was the response.  In 2018 we suddenly hear that the Bigelow Foundation was a money source -a very secretive body who churn out Non Disclosure Agreements by the crate. It should have been made very clear from the moment these researchers approach for or are offered funding by Bigelow or any source that they are being funded.

Why is Bigelow not funding The Centre for UFO Studies in its decades long work...because it operates openly and exchanges data openly?

The Bigelow connection in this "abduction research" lowers its credibility even more.

Using 'results' from this research should be considered risky -Bigelow has been accused of playing smoke and mirrors far too often re. UFOs.

Blog Update: Face Book Page

Not renewing here.

Yes, most major posts and features are no longer available to read here.

Reason is simple: over 14,000 views of this blog and there has been no show of support in anyway. I do not expect people to comment "nice post" or "I'd like to read more about this" people come here for a free read and in some cases steal material I have written to use as their own.

I had to struggle with myself over this but what convinced me, after every argument I could put up about keeping the blog active, was the fact that 14,000 views by people allegedly interested in the subjects covered had not resulted in the purchase of a single one of my books -my sole income and what kept me posting here.

Then I found more sites using more of my work and even my original art images.  That is plain theft.

You are seriously interested in fact and showing support then buy a book. Perhaps you prefer to just buy and read the fantasy books where you are told lies. Your choice.

I told someone that as soon as my books start selling I would start updating the blog -knowing full well that you do not support anything posted here so would never buy.

I have the Face Book page that no one has shown interest in even though I updated it.

It really did come to a crunch situation financially and that is why I made the decision about this blog...not that anyone cares.

Face Book page is where you should be looking.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/2463400933890105/?epa=SEARCH_BOX

An Explanation

I was asked why I was going to post things to Face Book. The answer is simple.

Producing new posts for this blog takes time. I hear from no one. No comments. No news items forwarded. I may as well post to myself.

366,077 people have viewed and read the AOP blog. Over 4000 have read the AE CE3K blog. That is a total of 370, 187 views.  But not one person has even purchased a copy of one of my books which are full of far more interesting things than you'll find here and I am NOT going to publish chapter after chapter for free.

If 370, 187 views shows interest in these subjects why are there no book sales.

We have been over this before: you want something for free that does not cost you money or force you to read even if you are going to learn far more.

So, this group gets left as it is but Face Book is not ideal but it is easy to post to while I answer messages.

Pure and simple.

I get no financial support from the blogs and certainly no moral support!  See you on FB or not.

most Material on Face Book Page now.

Some reports and other information not posted here will be posted on the AE-CE3K Face Book page. If there are any questions please Message via that page.