They Never Met - But They All Described the Same Beings

 

It's The Eyes

 Someone asked me why I believe some accounts and not others?

Well, if you have 3-4 witnesses plus independent corroboration from a fourth unconnected person who saw a UFO or after effects that are impossible to explain in mundane ways it helps.

But there is one thing that convinces me of someone being genuine. Every interview or photograph of people who had onboard experiences all have the same thing in common: The eyes.  You can watch one interview after another with alleged "alien abduction victims" and there is nothing but then there is just one and as soon as you see the eyes it is almost like a slap in the face.; Even the best actors cannot pull that certain look off because they ARE acting. If you have every studied footage of soldiers suffering from shell shock you will see a certain look.

I've spoken to people who have allegedly been "abducted" and I take notes and listen. The odd one will turn up and you look at the eyes and you just listen. Notes can wait. Just listen to what they have to say  because;' "that look" (see the blog header photo and especially Mona Stafford).

Incidentally, I have still not managed to find out whether Mona Stafford is still alive. If anyone knows PLEASE let me know.

The Fermi Paradox Just Got Worse...some notes

 

"Why are they not visiting us?"

Well, UFO reports. Not the ones pushed by the people who think every satellite or mundane object reported by someone is a sign of extraterrestrial visitation. The whole reason for looking at  CE3K/AE reports is that they are either genuine or fake and it takes a lot to get a High rating. Or what appear to be solid constructed craft. 

There are a few astronomers who have an interest in UFOs but, let's face it, if you look at the huge fuss the UFO grifters are causing and the MANY fake UFO videos on social media (Twitter is quite seriously a "UFO nut job" site!) why do they want to be pulled involuntarily into that?

If you ignore all of the UFO reports then: no alien visitations. There are certain astrophysicists who have their heads firmly up their own arses and ego bigger than Mount Everest. Anything that could mean more intelligent life than them.... nope. Walking away. I remember the famous account of a huge meeting of astronomers and when they were alerted to UFOs in the sky outside...they refused to get up and go look. "Flying saucer rubbish!" BUT they did not get up and go see thus showing that they had no interest in science just the free meals and jobs for life.

Even though there is no 100% proof of extraterrestrial visitation the evidence is still strong. I spent years trying to disprove reports and then had to face the fact that they could not all be explained. So the response to "Why are they not visiting us?" is  "They may well be but you are just ignoring reports out of sheer ego".

For around four decades I have stated that "exo-biologists" (all theoretical) and SETI pushers have probably got it all wrong. 

"This is how WE developed so any alien life MUST do the same" Species ego with these people is incredible. "We developed radio therefore any alien civilisation must have started out the same way: radio signals should be everywhere!" 

Humankind has spent millennia warring and killing each other and developing technology for that purpose and anyone with advanced thinking and ideas was stoned to death, made to commit suicide or executed by the state for their theories. Even today good scientists and thinkers are mocked, ostracised and, yes, still driven to despair and suicide BECAUSE their theories are against established dogma where a non peer reviewed paper is accepted as scientific fact when a quick check finds all the flaws. Publish a paper to keep your funding no furthering human knowledge,

Our space program is a joke. After 50 years of not going back to the Moon we make a huge fuss that a crew flew around the Moon...not many people cared. Look at this:

"The US defense budget is experiencing a massive increase, with the Trump administration requesting a $1.5 trillion defense budget for the upcoming fiscal year, aiming to expand military spending during the Iran conflict. The Department of Defense (DoD) has total budgetary resources of $2.08 trillion for FY 2026, and as of April 2026, about $1.18 trillion of that has been committed"

Then look at this and take it in:

"The United States remains the world's leading spender on space programs, with NASA's fiscal year 2026 budget set at approximately $24.44 billion. Total US space expenditure, including military and intelligence programs (such as the Space Force), is significantly higher, with government space expenditures projected to remain the highest globally, totaling tens of billions annually."

Yes, war mongering and killing and having better weapons than anyone else is far more important than space exploration. Humans like killing more than discovery. $1.5 Trillion could make huge leaps in cancer and other disease research but... meh -bigger weapons are better. 

Idiots like Prof. Brian Cox state there are no aliens out there; it is just us". Ego boosting himself because that means he's still top IQ dog and showing his humanity by stating the reason there are no aliens is because they all destroyed themselves in wars just like we do. We call this the idiocy of science.  WHY should alien life forms want to go to war, develop civilisations and then have bigger wars and wipe themselves out? Because that is what HUMANS have and will do. 

Well, let's stop the space program there shall we?

Grifters and idiots populate this whole field of what cannot be called a search for possible  extraterrestrial life because those who are in the field or pushing their dogma always say the same thing -there are even talks on You Tube with these people saying this- "It is NOT aliens -it is NEVER aliens!"  so, Brian Cox says there are no alien civilisations (his huge intellect cannot be wrong) meaning he is stating clearly that his "colleagues" are time wasting and...uh..the SETI people say it is NEVER extra-terrestrial "because".

It seems a LOT of people have well paid jobs for life, free meal tickets and only have to turn out the odd paper to keep those funds rolling in.  Meaning the whole SETI -Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence- and CETI (Communications with ET Intelligence totally made up field there)  are a waste of time and money. It's a con along the side lines as the UFO grifters like Elizondo, Vallee et al -make statements and publish things that are total fiction but watch as the money rolls in.

CE3K/AE Study Project Report No. 001: 1973 Eupora (Mississippi) Multi-Witness UFO Landing Event

 

 26pp

A4

B&W

£9.50

https://www.lulu.com/en/en/shop/terry-hooper/1973-eupora-mississippi-multi-witness-ufo-landing-event/paperback/product-qwvnkp.html?page=1&pageSize=4

1973 –Year of the “Global UFO Wave” 

1973 –The “Year of the Humanoids” 

1973 –The year of the Pascagoula alien abduction claim 

1973 –Several witnesses observed two Unidentified Flying Objects: one temporarily landed on a US Interstate road while the other hovered close-by. An entity appeared from the landed object. A car driver approaching from the opposite direction stops, turns his/her car and races off. 

This is classed as a Major Incident in Ufology. 

1973 –a driver observes a landed UFO and entities and opens fire with his gun when he felt threatened. A High Strangeness account. 

Neither of these cases was investigated despite requests for local investigators to do so. Even in 2020 the idea of opening up either as a cold case was flatly Rejected by America’s ‘top UFO investigation’ group. 

Reports now probably lost to history. 

1973 –a year in which UFO reports from African-Americans were frowned upon and ignored. 

Nothing has changed.

For those interested here is the actual radio recording

Another New Book and What Will Happen To The Archive?

 

Just talking to someone and was asked if I still had enough material for another book on AE/CE3K? I think I have enough for another three.  

I pointed out that each book can take a year to put together, edit and then double check facts in cases -unlike 99% of writers on UFOs today I do not cut and paste (I could get a new book out once a week doing that). People are interested and spend their money on a book they deserve factual reporting not fiction to make things more mysterious.  

The problem is, checking on all the views posts about the books have had  since the first book (UFO Contact) was published they have been viewed one million times. And since that first book was published I have not made enough money from them to buy a copy of UFO Contact. 

 So, would I spend a year of research, background checking and then type up another hefty volume on this subject while the other gather internet dust?

No.

Also, my family has absolutely no interest in my work and as no one in the UK has ever shown the slightest interest in cooperating or the Archives themselves I am leaving it up to my family; 50+ years of work up in flamed or in a skip. I won't be here to worry about it.

3,134

 Yes 3,134 views so far this month. No book sales from those views and not even one question?

I have "created much excitement"

 I have to say that my books contain facts. Not fantasy. When a case cannot be proven fake it gets a high rating. Ufologists seem to have no interest in these. Ufologists have NEVER been interested in cooperating on the CE3K/AE Study over 50 years and only one person has offered to look for info if they can help at any point.

I have been sent screen shots from  (I assume) UFO chat sites about the observers to the UFO over Jean Hingley's home during the "Mince pie Martians" incident. "Very convenient he came up with this"....which sounds like I am being called a liar by people who have not gotten in touch with me. One thing I noted is that the brief info I posted has been quoted by some as "Witnesses saw the UFO and entities" and "eye witnesses to the abduction".

People are outright fantasising/lying based on nothing.

Also, for the first time ever I have had several "investigators/researchers" want to "exchange info on what was seen" -they want ME to tell them what I found out.  I wrote the definitive account in Lost Contacts which has sold one copy (that is not a joke) so why the interest? So they can add the info to THEIR books or articles and after all these decades I can bet I would get no credit.

I have not yet decided how to present the brief back up story but when/if I do I will let everyone know.

What a Bloody mess this subject is in!

 Aleister Crowley and pretend "Greys" -LOTS of hits. The fact that there is corroboration of the Jean Hingley CE3....7 views.

I quit

Aleister Crowley and the Grey Aliens

 People so love creating lies and false claims. It is one reason why Ufology will not be accepted because it is so full of obvious falsehoods...to anyone who can read.

Read this online entry about Aleister Crowley:

"Occultist Aleister Crowley is believed by some to have opened a portal to extra-dimensional entities, or "aliens," during his 1917–1918 "Amalantrah Working" rituals in New York. He produced a drawing of an entity named "Lam," which bears a striking resemblance to the modern "gray alien" archetype, decades before they became common in popular culture."

Firstly, Crowley could hardly be called the most trustworthy of people and was far from a pleasant person -his obvious ego relished the fact that he was called "The Beast" (along with the false 666 -an incorrect number: do the research). He was a drug user and so much more yet, due to popular fiction in books, TV and comics he is seen as some kind of enlightened groundbreaker.

 

For those who struggle: TV fantasy shows and comic books are NOT learned sources.

 

Lam seemed to be "preternatural" -ie beyond what is normal or natural. "Supernatural" would cover it. No hidden star maps. Again:

 

"Lam is a spiritual entity or "extra-dimensional intelligence" channeled by occultist Aleister Crowley around 1917–1918, often considered a precursor to modern "Grey alien" archetypes. Appearing in a 1919 drawing, Lam is associated with the Amalantrah Working and is described as a "way" or portal to other dimensions."

 

"Extra dimensional" is another way of saying "the spiritual plain" NOT extraterrestrial. Lam in the illustration looks NOTHING like a modern "grey" -in fact I have posted before about how many actual "genuine Greys" there are. Lam does NOT look like any of the "Greys" from modern literature/pop culture. Fantasists have made the huge leap (by ignoring all the known sources).

 

Crowley then moved to the studio apartment of Roddie Minor, who became his partner and Scarlet Woman. Through their rituals, which Crowley called "The Amalantrah Workings", he believed that they were contacted by a preternatural entity named Lam.  According to online sources:

 

"Roddie Minor (1884–1979) was an American occultist, artist, and a "Scarlet Woman" partner to Aleister Crowley in 1918. She is best known for participating in the "Amalantrah Workings," a series of sex magick rituals in New York that resulted in the reported channeling of the entity known as "Lam"

 

Lam also disappeared after this which meant the entire thing was either manufactured to make money or all in Crowley's imagination fuelled by drugs or mental health issues.

 

I mention all of this because I have seen one supposed Ufologist after another stating that Crowley stated he was in touch with extraterrestrials and given a lot of secret alien knowledge. If so he forgot it all or just could not be bothered. Each of the claims made first appeared in works of fiction.

 

Read the Crowley books and stop trying to create a fantasy world to live in.

The "Mince Pie Martians" Incident

 In January, 1979, we heard of the Jean Hingley UFO encounter case (see my last book Earth The Lost Contacts)) known, thanks to clunk headed reporters and Ufologists as "The Mice Pie Martians" case.

The problem is that, however, "odd"  the account sounded there were obvious elements of memory loss and ground traces that Hingley could NOT have faked. Everyone wanted to jump in with their opinion but no one was seriously investigating the case. When I spoke to her by phone it was obvious that she was not lying and believed what she told me.She mentioned a rumour that others had seen the object or at least a UFO that same time but that was it.

47 years later someone has gotten into contact with me about what his father and workmates saw on the day of Hingley's encounter above her house. although family suggested reporting what was seen the fear of ridicule and official problems meant that the response was "no".

I am not going to update the book with this information but will put it into print at some point.