Laugh and Scream... The Paul Brown Encounter

 If Eupora and the multi witness CE3K did not interest Ufologists (because the witnesses were all black) and they rejected looking into other "black folk" (quote) reports not surprising that Paul Brown and his account was ignored.

That is where you have to laugh. And scream.

A rare news item and we cab see that the "black motorist" was in fact.... white.

People keep saying "it was Mississippi 1973" as though that excuses a lot including not checking your facts.

 

The Stanford, Kentucky UFO & alien abduction mystery, Jan 6 1976 (updated with interview & hypnosis)

75,031 views 9 Aug 2022

Jan. 6, 1976 was Mona Stafford's 36th birthday. To celebrate, she and her friends Louise Smith and Elaine Thomas decided to drive thirty-five miles from their home in Liberty, Kentucky, to have dinner at the Redwoods Restaurant, between Stanford and Lancaster, Kentucky. Louise Smith was driving them in her '67 Chevy Nova. The three women had an enjoyable dinner together. None of them drank any alcoholic beverages with their meal. At about 11:15, the trio headed back home, expecting to be home by midnight. At Stanford, Kentucky, nine miles from Lancaster, they turned off Highway 27 and onto Highway 78 towards Hustonville. Just outside Stanford, a curious thing happened. A bright red object appeared in the sky, which Mona Stafford at first thought was an airplane on fire. As the object descended from the right side of the road to a point ahead of them, they could see that it was not an airplane, but a huge object bigger than "two houses." The object stopped about a hundred yards ahead of them, stretching across the road on both sides. It rocked back and forth for a couple of seconds, and then moved off to the left. They kept driving, and assumed that whatever it was had kept going. However, after they had been about a quarter of a mile, a blue light appeared through the rear window of the car. At first they thought it was a highway patrol car with its lights flashing, but soon they realized that the flying object had circled around and had come up behind them. Suddenly, something wrested control of the car away from Louise Smith. The car accelerated even though Mrs. Smith took her foot off the accelerator, and the speedometer was soon on 85 mph. Mona Stafford, in the front passenger seat, tried to help Louise regain control of the car, but it was not possible. The women began to feel a burning sensation in their eyes. The ignition lights lit up on the instrument panel, an indication that the car's engine was stalled, but they were still speeding along. They saw a wide, brightly lit road ahead of them, and then, seconds later, the scene became Highway 78 and they recognized they were on the outskirts of Hustonville, a full eight miles from where they had just been. Checking the time, they found that, incredibly, an hour and twenty minutes had passed. They arrived at Louise Smith's trailer in Liberty at 1:25 am, almost an hour and a half late. They went inside to collect themselves and found that they each had a red mark like a burn on the backs of their necks, and they all had burning, irritated eyes. Louise Smith went into the bathroom and removed her watch to wash her face. She saw that the hands of her watch were spinning at a much higher than normal speed. When she splashed water on her face, she found that contact with water caused pain in her hands and face. They went next door, to the home of Mr. Lowell Lee, and told him what had happened. He had them separately sketch the object they had seen. The sketches were extremely similar, if not identical. They called the police and the local navy office, but neither showed any interest in their story. In the days that followed, Mona Stafford had more problems with her eyes than did the other two women, and she sought medical help for severe conjunctivitis. Louise Smith's pet parakeet was now inexplicably terrified of her and the bird died a couple of months later. Smith's car also began to develop mysterious electrical problems. The navy office reportedly gave information about the story to the news media, and the story was soon in the newspapers. Hearing of the case, Jerry Black of MUFON set up an interview with the three women. J. Allen Hynek of CUFOS and Jim and Coral Lorenzen of APRO also investigated the case. The investigators found that other individuals had independently reported sightings of a UFO in the Casey and Lincoln counties that same night. Dr. R. Leo Sprinkle of the University of Wyoming heard of the case and flew in, and on March 7, 1976, he performed a preliminary hypnotic regression of the women. In July of 1976, Lexington Police Department detective James Young separately gave the three women lie detector tests regarding their experience. They all passed with no problems. Later that evening and continuing into the next day, extensive hypnotic regression of the women was performed by R. Leo Sprinkle. These sessions were similar to the story of Betty and Barney Hill in that they revealed that during the period of missing time the three women were taken on board the object they had seen. While there they were medically examined by shadowy beings that they later identified as being similar to depictions of aliens. (Completely Kentucky Wiki) Speaker: Lydia Morel. UPDATED VERSION: The Stanford, Kentucky UFO & alien abduction mystery, Jan 6 1976 (updated with interview & hypnosis)

The 1976 Stanford Kentucky Abductions - Revisited

This is th last known interview with the last of the surviving women , Mona Stafford. Even all these years later the stress and effect of the event on her still shows. A Full and accurate account of the event and a look at why this was one of the best cases can be found in my book UFO Contact?

1975 interview with a man who claims he was abducted by aliens Parker and Hickson

Carl Higdon Interview

 

So can we all do this or is it dangerous to hold my breath?

 

There are internet and book chases I go on for days with no results. I am one man doing unpaid research.

There are thousands of views per day so, once again, I am going to make an appeal. You don'tr even have to get oput of your chairs.

I am trying to find a photograph of Goffstown UFO abductee Lyndia Morel.

I am also trying to find a full report on the 1975 Happy Camp UFO abductions -Helen C White being one of the abductees.  MUFON Journal never printed parts 3 and 4 of Paul Cerny's report (I've searched up to 1981 -nothing).

I have parts 1 and 2 from MUFON Journal and both parts from UFO Research Newsletter but anything else is welcome!

So can we all do this or is it dangerous to hold my breath?

Terry Hooper

  Terry Hooper was a member of  the Society for the Investigation of The Unexplained (SITU), Aerial Phenomena Research Organisation (APRO), British Flyinbg Saucer Bureau for which he was head of research and investigation and edited their publication UFO News Bulltin.  He was also a British UFO Research Association (BUFORA) Regional Investigations Coordinator and advisor on UK Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

From 1977- he coordinated the Anomalous Observational Phenomena Bureau which covered a wide range of topics but mainly UFO related. The 500 pages Report on UFOs (1980) was privately distributed amonmgst members of the House of Lords UFO Study Group and other officials.

In 1974 he set up the CE3K/Alien Entity Study gathering reports from around the globe and leading research on the subject even aftewr five decades.

Terry also helped set up the Gloucestershire UFO Research and Investigation Group, Wessex UFO Investigation Group and acted as an advisor to others. He provided articles on CE3K cases, meteorites and ball lightning to publications of a number of UK based UFO groups.

I don't get paid for this you know!

 It is 0100 hrs and I have spent since 1200hrs (mid day) trying to track down details of a 1975 UFO abduction case. Dr Mark Rodheiger over at CUFOS sent me some pages from the MUFON UFO Journal but it seems the Journal never published the promised parts 3 and 4.

Emails and messages and nothing. Deep internet dives and following some of the most obscure links I managed to get more information than has so far appeared in print since 1977!

I don't get paid for this you know!

Has It Been Worth it?

 

I just spent weeks chasing after details of a 1970s abduction report which Street of Silence said was held in the Klass Archive. Well, they've been proven fibbers again. They are just regurgitating what they have seenb onl;ine and made more out of it. 

I then spent days trying to find details of the November 1975 UFO abductions case at Happy Camp, California. No one has ever heard of it (including people who have allegedly read and cite Vallee's book Confrontations -he does not detail the case just basically waffles on with his personal favourite grift. Could not find the "widely reported on" story anywhere so today I deep dived into obscure 1970s UFO publications and.... got the details.

Elsewhere British Ufology has fallen to pieces when it comes to looking into certain widely reported cases -even one Ufologist distancing himself from more than one report and dumping a former colleague.

Elsewhere cases have had to be downgraded as well known Ufologists have "mislaid" reports, or had no full investigation reports on "major UFO incidents". I doubt the reports ever existed.

Ufologists in Europe have been about as cooperative as those in the United States...in other words they either do not respond to emails and messages or grunt. 

Perhaps, unsurprisingly, the greatest offenders when it comes to factual reporting on CE3K reports are You Tube "content creators". They make things up, twist facts and even alter things to fit a certain narrative with a varietyt of very poor AI created images.

It does make me ask if the past 50 odd years looking at this aspect was worth it?

The photo of the CE3K/AE archives from 2024 was before they were updated. All folders are now in a stack of archive boxes as I decide what to do with them.

“The Andreasson Affair”

I read all the articles and books by Raymond Fowler on this case. Based on the original book I thought there were aspects that seemed a bit off but it seemed to be a solid case. My the time of Fowler's final book I realised that this case was not solid and that there was so much going on that seemed doubtful or based on suggestions and guess work that it got a Low rating in the files.

There is also a perfect example of why an investigator should not look into these reports if they are not prepared. Like many other Ufologists Fowler suddenly realised he had a childhood scar and sighting. He could not recall how he got the scar (we are talking an adult man in his 60s trying to remember an incident that was not even important as a child). Yes, suddenly, Fowler was....an abductee.

I suggest that anyone who can get the books do so if interested and make up their own minds.

Unfortunately most of the You Tube videos on this case, as with many others, use AI images and these vary from poor to extremely bad, inaccurate depictions. Hence my using this recorded interview.

This video is not perfect but...

UFO TV: In Search Of - UFO Captives (1978) with Leonard Nimoy Full Episode

 Initially I had assumed, oh those many years back, that this was a case of a tired man and altered reality experience.  However, with all the sightings and extra details the case has held up.