Photograph was taken of the UFO in two or three cases. "Never published" or they did not exist? All of the American and South American Ufologists who copied and reprinted the news stories but not one got a copy of any of the photos? Oh it was an "official cover up" not down to the fact Ufologists founded it less work to just reprint news items -standard from 1940-2000s.
Hundreds of observers (if we take just one case) so where are the gathered statements as evidence? Surely APRO had as many gathered as possible? No.
One man identified as the translator of the items and we do not even have his real name.
The French 1954 UFO wave was no such thing. Assessing all of the material, including from French language sources, we see that meteorites, aircraft, helicopters and even a man repairing a broken down bus were all mixed into the pot. 95% at least of the "Wave" was false. People like Jacques Vallee know this but ...
We are NOT being presented with "irrefutable proof" in these videos just stories. Some of the entity cases I have dealt with in my books (Contact) and they are impressive because something obviously DID happen.
I, personally, observed a 7 feet tall carrot-like entity and UFO in my back garden. 20 other people saw it all. Prove that statement false. Only my confession to a false statement would be evidence.
The use of some outright stupid AI images/clips only helps take away any credibility because they are so laughable and "if he resorts to this AI trash how far can he be trusted?"
I've spent over five decades looking at the subject of AE/CE3K encounters and assessing the evidence and reporting on them. People will ignore that because some hack has posted utter rot on You Tube with really awful AI.
No comments:
Post a Comment