A Few Words

Firstly, I have to say that out of all the organisations and researchers (I use that term loosely) I contacted regarding case reports for my books only one has actually been cooperative -Keith Basterfield in Australia. 

Why do so called UFO "research" groups not cooperate? We used to in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s but the internet and what seems to be an attitude of "if we ignore him he will go away" came along. Since when was looking at case reports and offering to forward data on cases wrong?

I learnt the hard way that very few -very few- reports were actually investigated and when, 25-30+ years later a Ufologist did and found out that press details were inaccurate they were outraged. Maybe if they had gotten off of their asses in the first place we might have learnt more -but then the pretence of belonging to a "serious investigation and research" field was more important than the reports. "I can learn all I need to know from press reports while sat in my comfortable chair" as one noted Ufologist told me.

I have learnt that the so called UFO waves -such as 1954- were far from major UFO waves. Amongst the genuine reports there are hoaxes, misidentifications and much more. CE3K reports are far rarer than some might claim and to wave a list of cases based on news paper stories simply shows why there are such bad statistics.  The fact that some Ufologists (some very famous ones) include known fake/hoax cases in their catalogues makes those catalogues not just highly questionable but also useless. 

Ufologists have spent a lot of time harassing percipients, threatening to out them to the press and even warning them to keep quiet (it's their case so they will keep the reports and no one else can see them).  We had the whole deception of the "Greys" based on false information from celebrated self taught hypnotising Ufologists who discovered "who" was behind UFOs....but then found "who" was behind them and it kept rolling on from there.  For 30+ years Ufology jumped onto the Greys abduction agenda and it got to be not just poor sci fi but fantasy of a poor level. But this was money making...as were "rods" (disproven very early on), "orbs" and much more.  Money and ego has been more important than fact and research.

95% of CE3K reports have never been investigated. That means that those cases cannot be claimed as evidence of anything. I have gone into many old reports and found extra details as well as reports not known in the English language not to mention extremely rare photos and images. Why were these not all known in detail before?  Because they took place outside the United States but having written that what would be classed as major UFO incidents in the United States were never investigated.

I have managed to break down reports so that we see very common entity types as well as some never noted before.  So what has everyone been doing since 1947? Oh, ignoring and mocking CE3K reports but accepting racist inspired contactee accounts. George Adamski was a fake -sorry to break that to you. 

Actual landings and entity sightings have been ignored because the observers refused to believe they had been abducted (they were aware of the flow of time) or accept that they saw "Greys" when they had not.

This year I want to try to concentrate on reports that were never investigated in the 1960s and 1973. If I succeed it will be worth the effort it is going to take. I have searched for serious investigators in Mississippi for five years or to get UFO groups interested -none are interested.

But why are we not hearing of more recent landings and entity cases -are the UFO conmen and fake drone phenomenon making people not come forward or making ufologists ignore them?