Despite my own good advice yesterday I decided to watch some You Tube videos on UFO encounters and Abduction reports. I reminded myself later on in the day that it was my own fault for ignoring my own advice.
Apparently the entities involved in the 1950s Kelly-Hopkinville report were "what we would describe today as Greys". No. No they were not. I mean the number of illustrations over the decades and you are so dumb ass or desperate to get views by saying "Greys" and you ignore them all.
Describing an encounter and the now all too familiar use of detestable AI art gave us the account that described entities that were clearly NOT "Greys" but the AI art depicted Greys.
In some cases the narrator (with a brain one step up from an amoeba -my apologies to amoebas everywhere) suggested (emphasising as this WAS the true answer) that the unusual entities described were nothing more than "screen images" to hide the fact that Greys were involved. Oh yes, Budd Hopkins' "screen image" that developed and hid so many lies. I once received taped recordings from my friend in the US, Lindy Whitehurst, of Budd Hopkins talks. I recall that it all seemed so plausible when he revealed what he had discovered. Something that even the Lorenzens had failed to discover, and that was that behinds the abduction phenomenon lay...The Greys!
But, listening, I realised something was wrong. You see, Hopkins noted hypnotic regression bringing up forgotten memories -a sighting of a deer for instance- and that was all the percipient recalled. However, Hopkins was convinced that there was more and so the deer sighting was looked at again and the percipient became very stressed and could recall nothing. However, Hopkins was convinced that the deer was a "screen memory" and pushed on until the real culprit was disclosed -the Greys!
At the time I was reassured that all of this hypnosis work was being carried out under strict protocols and oversight. What a load of crap that turned out to be. Lies, lies, lies and more lies while the alleged percipients were being put through uncalled for psychological trauma. Hopkins Comrade-in-Fraud David Jacobs can be found on You Tube videos telling people that they did not just see a UFO "THEY WERE ABDUCTED!!" Yes, he does sort of shout that.
Of course, as Ann Druffel pointed out on numerous occasions, there used to be reports involving short entities with larger heads but never what Hopkins described as "Greys" and as I have pointed out in posts and books, the descriptions of "a true Grey" are so varied that how anyone took this seriously I have no idea but as a diversion Hopkins and Jacobs concocted the story the the Greys were never the true brains behind all of this. Oh no, we had reptiloids, mantis-like creatures, Tall Whites and so many more and looking at the drawings by alleged percipients you see a mixture of aliens from popular sci fi TV shows and movies.
But this does not matter to You Tubers, or even some bloggers it seems; no, what counts are are the views because there is money in that and maybe even a degree of celebrity status in that. Put in images of Greys -even where it contradicts the established facts as written down decades ago- and people will accept what you say. There are certain YT channels where the use of AI generated art is so awful that the "percipient" in the account changes appearance repeatedly while the entities ...well, it is idiot generated AI art.
Why do people call for "Disclosure" ("Next year is UFO Disclosure year" they keep claiming since 1998) and the truth when they accept proven con-men/liars words on everything and accept provable false information? And they throw money at these con-men!!
No, Thomas Mantell was NOT shot down by a flying saucer. Fact.
George Adamski was a con-man.
Cedric Allingham was a hoax -the man never existed.
Ernest Arthur Bryant and the whole "Scoriton Mystery" of 1965 was a 110% proven hoax (despite what You Tubers and bloggers say)
The only abduction cases are American and involve Betty and Barney Hill and Travis Walton. Why would citizens of any other country be of interest? Ufologists keep using these cases as they are tried and tested and Gods forbid they do anything like genuine investigation or first hand research.
People claiming to have observed a UFO landing and entities are flatly told "No. You were probably abducted and it was Greys" and when they insist they can account for every minute of time they are told to go away. One person was told by MUFONs specialist in Abductions -there are no landings and take offs only abductions- that they were denying the facts or that it might be a "psychological problem". Lose one possibly genuine reported account and data for research.
Facts lose out to You Tube Likes and subscribers. Only sensationalist money making books sell (if people bother reading). Ufology is and has been for decades, nothing more than a money spinning circus of fraud and entertainment.
No comments:
Post a Comment