Sensationalism rules in Ufology.Lies, deceit, bending of the truth or woolly brained thinking is far more accepted than researched facts.
"Alien ABDUCTION" is far sexier and draws in more views than "An object landed and something got out, tried to communicate with someone before re-entering object which took off".
Why is it thatr reports in which people are asked whether they would like to board a craft but say "no thanks" and a conversation continues or ends there are never highlighted? Brief observation of landed objects and entities are simply glossed over or there are suggestions made that there was "more" involved?
Preston Dennett on You Tube seems to accept every single account "because" why would anyone lie? Clear accounts of sleep paralysis altered states are taken as 100% genuine alien contact of "which there are thousands if not hundreds of thousands on record". No. Studying the reports it is clear that the incidents do not mount to "many thousands" not even if hoaxes, psychological cases and other explanations are added in.
WHY is it that every description is "of what we know as Grays" even when they are not and images are generated to show "Grey aliens"?
It is no wonder that Ufologists (there are a few serious ones) have gotten nowhere since 1947.
The "UFO waves" listed and noted ad nauseum were not huge peaks in UFO activity whether 1947, 1954/55 or later. Meteor sightings, aircraft misidentifications, ball lightning and other natural phenomena as well as misreporting and hoaxes are all included to make up these waves.
As noted in my books the idea of thousands if not millions of alien abductions of humans is laughable and based of proven fake research and claims. In many cases I will not use the term "abduction" because it is clear that there is far more involved and that the memory blocks reported are used for a reason. We could argue the reasons for weeks.
There are very specific entity types that are reported more often but because Ufology tends to refuse to look at reports unless they are sensationalist and "abductions" they have gone unrecognised and I am referring to reports that started in the 1950s-1970s.
I am looking into certain cases that have gone un-investigated and hope I can make some headway with them. Two are in the United States where every organisation and Ufologist I have contacted have refused to look into them!
We'll see.
One thing I am sure of is that when I am gone the work goes and the books will also vanish which is a pity but life will go on.
No comments:
Post a Comment