Friday, 7 August 2026
The Fermi Paradox
The Fermi paradox is the noticeable contradiction between the high statistical odds that alien life exists and the total lack of evidence or contact from them. Named after physicist Enrico Fermi, who famously asked "Where is everybody?" in 1950, it highlights how quiet the universe is despite billions of potential planets.
In fact, Fermi asked that after listening to a couple other scientists discussing the local "flying saucer" reports over lunch. I call it the "ass head of science". If Fermi and the other scientists were aware of local UFO reports and that what was described was well beyond anything the United States or Soviet Union had....the answer is "surveying (or whatever) Earth" -the reports you were all talking about.
Astronomers and scientists have been doing this since 1947: "there are all these UFO reports but nonsense because we've never detected them after years of SETI". This is very likely FAR (Fear of Alien Reality) since these people would lose their places as the exclusiove elite intelligences in science (what would they do for free meals and jobs for life??)
It is nonsensical. Remember that even esteemed US President Thomas Jefferson (one of the most learned men of his time -we are told) stated that he would sooner believe Yankee scientists were lying than that rocks fell from the sky. Despite thousands of detailed reports of ball lightning -some by scientists- we still have no idea what creates it and there are many scientists who still do not believe that it exists.
You might expect that the "open mind of science" would be looking into UFO reports. Back in 1980s it took a day after compiling many hundreds of reports to see that there were three classes of reports:
1. Insufficient could be anything and this was the category with the largest number of reports (hoaxes were totally ignored)
2. A form of natural phenomenon (NOT ball lightning, "Earth Lights" etc) that could leave phsical traces, change form and be pf various sizes/colours. The reports for this category would fill a couple chunky volumes. It could be classed as the most common phenomenon reported as UFOs.
3. Where witness credibility is good and the object is seen in the right conditions and is quite clearly construced but far beyond anything we had -then (1940s -/+) and today -UFOBs. We have to -have to- if we are looking at the data with an open mind and attempting to piece a picture togetrher of these UFOBs look at the landing cases, traces left and so on. In reality this has not been done by Ufology. We have to look at the physiological and psychological effects on people -what do the physiological effectys tell us -is a form of radiation involved, etc., etc.. Then we have to look at the alleged entities involved in these incidents and ask what the various physiological features reported tell us -something looked at on this blog in the past and in my books on the subject.
There are many cases that are clearly sleep paralysis or Ruth Syndrome (as explained in UFO Contact?) which suddenly become major abduction cases...after the persons involved read books by Hopkins, Jacobs and Streiber -what I term "absduction scenario primers". Only once we can seperate these cases can we get to the core data we need. Ufology refuses to do that as media attention and money is drawn in by whateever is popular at the time -"ghost lights", "Rods", "Abductions" etc etc.
Categories 1,2 and 3 get dumped into one huge pile and we end up with zero credible evidence to analyse. It took weeks to gather all of the reports from books, magazines, original reports and news items but a day to see a very clear pattern (The UFO Report -unpublished- went into all of this in 1980) but Ufologists were not interested and no comparable work has appeared since then.
I am quite sure that there is, somewhere on this planet, credible scientists who do look at the data but privately (Avi Loeb destroyed the chance for any scientist to come out and declare what they have found). I know that a few have expressed interest in reports but I recall a big conference of astronomers in the United States in the late 1960s(?) where no one got up to go and check when astronomers rushed in to reports UFOs flying around outside and they had no idea what they were. Real scientists would rush out if only to look and say "Idiots. That is----" But the true reaction of the jobs for life boys? They sat on their backsides and uttered the odd "ridiculous".
Fermi stands in his back yard staring up into the night sky while friends all around him star in awe at a flying saucer some 20 yardfs away. Fermi says "Where are they?" (a dozen fingers pointing does not constitute evidence)
That is what the Fermi Paradox means. General George Armstroing Custer stands atop a hillock during the battle of the greasy grass(Little Big Horn) and asks "Where are they?"
Friday, 31 July 2026
This is the mess we are in
If a woman experiences a missing time episode and not that geographically far away three women encounter a UFO -all on the same night do you:
1) talk to the main percipiuent then the other women to establish whether there was any time loss or...
2) without checking ignore the women in the second incident because you "can't see or think" of a connectionb?
Well, I know, tyo people with any kind of IQ 1) is the only option. Unless you are a British Ufologist and then you don't bother with the three women.
Seriously. It is on the record.
Three -3- "major UK UFO incidents" fell to pieces this wek because, according to one "investigator" all he had on the CE3K was a "standard UFO report form" and he did not have that any more as "I think I might have given that to a Ufologist" -UFO report forms contain confidential witness data. But, yeah, go on -give it away. So what evidence for the case is there? "My book".
Another ...investigator in a "major" CE3K has no idea where the percipient livews now, lkost contact with them seemingly after he and his group looked into nthe case. Can I get any of those details or case report? "Good question. no idea where it is but if I find it I shall let you know" I suspect there4 is no report.
Back in the 1990s some of the UKs top Ufologists werte at a convention panel and were confronted about what was said (there were others present when said)by one of their number that false UFO reports had been deliberately circulated by them since the 1970s. Each person on the panel looked at their colleague but not one would explain WHY fake reports had been published, for what purpose and refused to comment or identify which cases. 30+ years on the fake cases have never been identified whichj means that reports from the 1970s on and any associated with certain Ufologists cannot be trusted or seriously considered.
These were the people claiming to be approaching UFOs scientifically.
That is the mess we are in.
AOP Journal
I was asked when the next AOP Journal would appear?
My response was "When people BUY the thing!"
It is not worth putting weeks into writing and publishing a magazine that sells 5 copies (and not for every issue). Like the UFO books they get the praise but praise does not pay bills. It is why I put the other books on hold.
Scrap books as put together by Albert Rosales (do not get me started) sell more that full in depth books . People do not want to read.
Thursday, 30 July 2026
A Few Words
As far as I am concerned there are only THREE Close Encounter types. CE I, CE II and CE III. Anything else is superfluous. Ufologists tried to pretend they were scientists and so each tiny difference in a report made it a CE Ia or, ludicrously, at one point there were 9 different sub-CE III!
"Abductions"! Conversation with entities near a landed craft or simply sighting entities and a UFO are all CE IIIs but to differing degrees and after 50 years + I have become far more aware that many "abductions" are far from that. There are m,any hoaxes or even false information such as that created by Hopkins, Jacobs and even Mack -though the former were/are masters at spinning a web of false information that still gets accepted as fact even once exposed as UFO grifters.
All of the rubbish being printede, put outr online or via You Tube means that people are told "there are twodominant types in UFO abductions -the small Greys and thew tall, blond Nordics. Well, if only it was that simple.
We have seemingly genuine people who have undergone an onboard experience being mixed in with conmen and hoaxers such as George Adamski and other "Contactees". If you are dealing with onboard experiences then calling them "contactees" shows very little research work or reading has been done on the subject or the person pushing this is a typical dimwit.
I just watched a Small Town Monstrers video on UFO encounters and their 'experts' (X=The Unknown and spurt is a drip under pressure) were spouting the same old rubbish. Antonio Villas Boas was a simple farmer -how could he have heard about UFOs? Well, if you copy and paste your information from inaccurate online sources or even You Tube videos...yeah. Read UFO Contact? for a full detailed dive into the Villas Boas case...unless facts scare you?
People do not read any more -not unless it is the usual blatant trash churned out by UFO grifters who get caught out time and again but his cash cows still give him/her money.
Streets of Silence vuideos were quoted at me yesterday. The channel has no credibility as it carries out no real research gets facts and witness names wrong and, despite showing a sketch by a percipent which shows something that looks nothing like a "Grey" they will cakll it a "Grey alien".
If you truly want facts about cases then, and I am sorry to do so but I know of no other sources that deep dive into archives and publish facts, buy one of my books. Because of the print on demand process I do not get much per sale but the whole point is not making huge amounts of cash (if only) but to educate those with a serious interest in this aspect of UFOs.
No CE III...or CE IV...V...VI...VII just plain statement of the facts known. A light in the sky is just a lightin the sky but Who or what may be behind UFOs sighted will tell us a lot more and we NEED to know what is going on.
Monday, 27 July 2026
Inside the UFO Footage: The Abductee Speaks & Film Analysis-(links to video in description)
Who the actual bllep is taking this sertiously? Ufology is just a joke now. Why am I not convinced? Because it looks faked, the story sounds fake (if you can listen to the videographers droning voice for long ) there is no inflection or any indicators that he is telling a true account.
Then we have this clip.Stephen Leeah - Craniomaxillofacial Constructs Amalgamate Patterns.mp4 I suggest you watch the clip and see WHY this case should not be taken seriously: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p-JI50Ib-1Cl3zj5D5RhV3XdkrQwPPoS/view
The Betty Andreasson alien abduction incident in South Ashburnham, Massachusetts, January 25, 1967
Originally I rated this case but then...I read more and more and it seems that even Raymond Fowler may have influence some of what was being reported. Again, Fowler even convinced himself that he was an abductee, The books are worth reading as case studies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Date: 26th July, 1965, Location: Carazinho, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil This is based on a report by the Brasilian UFO group S.B.E.D.V. ... -
In January, 1979, we heard of the Jean Hingley UFO encounter case (see my last book Earth The Lost Contacts) ) known, thanks to clunk heade...
