As far as I am concerned there are only THREE Close Encounter types. CE I, CE II and CE III. Anything else is superfluous. Ufologists tried to pretend they were scientists and so each tiny difference in a report made it a CE Ia or, ludicrously, at one point there were 9 different sub-CE III!
"Abductions"! Conversation with entities near a landed craft or simply sighting entities and a UFO are all CE IIIs but to differing degrees and after 50 years + I have become far more aware that many "abductions" are far from that. There are m,any hoaxes or even false information such as that created by Hopkins, Jacobs and even Mack -though the former were/are masters at spinning a web of false information that still gets accepted as fact even once exposed as UFO grifters.
All of the rubbish being printede, put outr online or via You Tube means that people are told "there are twodominant types in UFO abductions -the small Greys and thew tall, blond Nordics. Well, if only it was that simple.
We have seemingly genuine people who have undergone an onboard experience being mixed in with conmen and hoaxers such as George Adamski and other "Contactees". If you are dealing with onboard experiences then calling them "contactees" shows very little research work or reading has been done on the subject or the person pushing this is a typical dimwit.
I just watched a Small Town Monstrers video on UFO encounters and their 'experts' (X=The Unknown and spurt is a drip under pressure) were spouting the same old rubbish. Antonio Villas Boas was a simple farmer -how could he have heard about UFOs? Well, if you copy and paste your information from inaccurate online sources or even You Tube videos...yeah. Read UFO Contact? for a full detailed dive into the Villas Boas case...unless facts scare you?
People do not read any more -not unless it is the usual blatant trash churned out by UFO grifters who get caught out time and again but his cash cows still give him/her money.
Streets of Silence vuideos were quoted at me yesterday. The channel has no credibility as it carries out no real research gets facts and witness names wrong and, despite showing a sketch by a percipent which shows something that looks nothing like a "Grey" they will cakll it a "Grey alien".
If you truly want facts about cases then, and I am sorry to do so but I know of no other sources that deep dive into archives and publish facts, buy one of my books. Because of the print on demand process I do not get much per sale but the whole point is not making huge amounts of cash (if only) but to educate those with a serious interest in this aspect of UFOs.
No CE III...or CE IV...V...VI...VII just plain statement of the facts known. A light in the sky is just a lightin the sky but Who or what may be behind UFOs sighted will tell us a lot more and we NEED to know what is going on.
No comments:
Post a Comment