UP-dated: The Strange Aliens in Jardinopolis, Brazil (2008)

I contacted the Brazilian group directly and asked whether it might be possible to get more information on this report and explained my interest.

Nothing.

So, since 2017 I have been chasing up any possible secondary reporting.  Nothing.

It seems that this report may be a hoax and I was told the group in question had disbanded long before the report was made.

My conclusion: fake report

From Before It's News http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/2014/06/strange-aliens-in-the-rains-of-brazil-2470930.html

Location. Jardinopolis, Sao Paolo, Brazil

Date: December 27 2008
Time: 2100

Two local youngsters, Denilson and Rafael were playing in the Sebastian’s Chapel Square when they were surprised to see bright lights moving overhead heading towards a field close to the square. The lights seemed to be rotating around an ellipse form, and were red and blue in color; they suddenly descended and disappeared from sight.

Feeling somewhat frightened the two friends ran to a nearby house where they told their two other friends, Carlos and Cristiano. The boys knew that it hadn’t been an airplane since there wasn’t any noise and the lights seemed to have performed a vertical descent into the field. The now four witnesses approached the field and could now see the lights on the grounds alternating colors from red to blue.

Three of the boys were afraid to approach the field by Cristiano drove his scooter closer and illuminated the area with its headlights, as he did this, Carlos, Denilson and Rafael followed closely behind him. The boys could now see that the lights were suspended in mid-air in a diagonal position and under the lights they could see three or more “crouching” creatures on the field. The creatures were crouching in a horseshoe or U-formation and appear to be “communicating” with each other.

The boys were extremely frightened, since they had never seen anything like that before. The boys were convinced that the creatures were not animals, since their behavior was totally different from that of typical farm animals that abounded in the area. The boys explained that the creatures were well-defined but when they changed their viewing angle they were able to see four and up to five creatures, giving some the creatures the appearance of being “invisible” and only becoming visible when the struck by the light rain that was falling at the time.

When Cristiano shone his scooter headlight directly on the creatures they disappeared. They could only see the creatures when it was dark. In the darkness they still see the contours of their bodies. The boys estimated the creatures to have been about 1.20 meters in height, with large black oval-shaped eyes, lacking noses or ears, they had a round mouth and their color was dark gray. They had hands with fingers but were unable to count how many fingers on each hand. All four youths gave identical description of the creatures.

They observed the creatures for approximately forty minutes and during the time the boys noticed that the creatures appeared to be communicating among themselves. Suddenly they saw a red “laser point” on Carlos’s shirt, Rafael pointed it out to Carlos who became afraid, and he immediately lifted his arms in a way to demonstrate that he was no threat to them and that he was unarmed. At this point the witnesses could see a red beam of light that appeared to be emanating from a cylindrical shaped object on the field, there also appeared to smoke coming from the tip of the object.

Terrified the four witnesses began leaving the area slowly concerned for their safety. The youths estimated that they had stood about 10 meters from the creatures. They arrived home afraid and nervous. Three days later the witnesses visited the site and found that the brush in the area had turned brown in color.

Source: Milton Dino Frank Junior, Presidente do Centro de Ufologia Brasileiro

1970, THE CHARENTE, FRANCE

1970, THE CHARENTE, FRANCE:

There are MANY reports that do not conform to the false Grey standard of ufology. The problem comes with the age of a report.
If someone reports an incident 25-30 years after it was alleged to have taken place we only have their owrd on the matter but if it conforms to Greys reports then some doubt arises.

If the reportee told other members of his/her family and/or kept some kind of written account that can be dated -a diary entry in which ink age can be tested- it helps.

Please note that I have tidied up this statement (from Ufologie.com) to make it more readable and I apologise for the translation quality.

1970, THE CHARENTE, FRANCE:
Brief summary of the event and follow-up:

On May 27th, 2007, a gentlemen sent the following story to me by email:

"I was 20 (then), I am 57 (today). My testimony is thus 37 years old and during all these years I was haunted by what I saw that day.

I was heading home at about 1 a.m. (I live in the country in the Charente) there is a field opposite my house and in this field I saw a landed half sphere which could be clearly distinguished in the darkness.

"I did not pay any attention and I park my car a few meters further on. The orange dome is still in the field on the other side of the road. I opened the gate to get to my home and I then closed it behind me.  I was about to cross the yard that separates me from the house (I was in the dark and I found my way by habit) and it was then that i heard footsteps on the gravel in front of me -they (seem to) run away on all sides but I saw nothing. I was very frightened. I rushed into the barn to switch on the outside light .

"In the yard (I saw) nothing but behind the gate I had closed I could distinguish human shapes(of kids) that looked at me. I felt that something was wrong and my fear increased.

"I went to the house to get a rifle and then I went back to the fence then on to the road. The view between myself and the half sphere was clear  and I saw two little beings come toward me. They stopped at approximately three meters from me. They seemed to talk to me but my fear was such that I raised my rifle. They then turned back and went away slowly.

"I went to wake up my parents but on looking they found nothing. All (entities) had disappeared. The sphere too.

"A brief article in the local newspaper reported a ufo was sighted above Angouleme that night. (The witness believes that) it landed in front of me and that changed my vision of the world"
Witness email, non anonymous, anonymity preserved, to this website (Patrick Gross, Ufologie), on May 27, 2007.

There are problems. The witness assumes that what he saw was the "UFO" sighted over Angouleme -but based on standard reporting that might have been a meteorite or anything else!

No one else witnessed the entities or object. A debunker would simply say "hoax".  However, we are unaware of the psychological state of the witness at the time -was he tired, exhausted or under stress somehow? Almost 50  years after the event, even if spoken to today, make that impossible to know.

The use of a rifle is slightly worrying. That the entities moved away on it being pointed at them could mean that they had encountered weapons in human hands before. Or, if this were an "altered state" event then to his mind the rifle did what it was supposed to -scare off intruders.

The "invisible runners" could indicate an altered state as described by "Ruth Syndrome" (detailed in UFO Contact?). One might wonder why an hemispherical object in the field had not caused alarm rather than not much interest? It is possible that the witness just gave it a casual glance and thought it might be something moved into the field by someone since aliens did not appear to be something he was thinking about. OR it might be the point at which he began to enter an altered state -a waking dream, which are quite vivid and very real to those experiencing them.

But if this was all in his head why a UFO and aliens -today you might expect it as the subject is everywhere from Japan to China to India and so on via the internet, TV and so on. 1970 was not a huge year for press coverage of UFOs -the witness mentions a brief news item AFTER his sighting.

No wish for publicity.  A joke? We just cannot tell which is why we really need to investigate -as thoroughly as we can- any and all reports that we find.

We have probably already lost so much information.

Encounter at Torva

 Although I have been gathering, reading and studying Close Encounters of the Third Kind (CE3K) and entity cases for over four decades I still find surprises.

John Hanson's Haunted Skies series has turned up a few surprises and mainly because he has either spoken to witnesses and got facts directly from them (correcting what ufologists had written 2nd, 3rd or 4th hand) or they have spoken only to him about their encounter.

One such report came from a Mary Sinton. Details are as follows from the AOP B  Entry:

UK     June 1980   Torva, Cumbria
John Hanson  Haunted Skies vol. 8  p. 103

Mary Sinton, owner of a B&B Farm, told Hanson about an encounter while on a camping holiday:

“I was with my boyfriend, Paul, at the time, and returning back to the campsite in our Hillman Imp car, along the A593, Ambleside to Coniston Road (Grid ref: Long 323, Lat 999/8, No. 7 English Lakes, SE area)  As we turned a bend in the road, close to the campsite, I was astonished to see  nine tall ‘figures’. Stood in a group of trees near the side of the road, caught in the glare of the spotlights fitted to the Hillman Imp I was travelling in.

“I estimated they were at least 7ft tall and identically dressed, wearing silver-white coloured helmets and body armour, carrying what looked like a rod, carried vertically in front of each of them –reminding me of a regiment of soldiers, stood to attention on the parade ground.

“As we drove past, I left it for a few seconds and then shouted out, in great excitement, ‘Did you see them, Paul?’  One look at his face confirmed he had, although, oddly, he had only seen one ‘figure’.  When we arrived at the campsite, we felt very nervous and had trouble sleeping, wondering if anything else was going to happen.

“The next morning, we discussed what had happened and wondered whether we should let the police know but, on reflection, thought they would never believe us”.

Hanson spoke to Paul who confirmed the events given by Sinton. He told Hanson:

“It was the most unusual thing I have ever seen in my life.  It defies explanation”.

Note that no UFO was sighted nor is there any suggestion that Mary or Paul thought "Aliens!" It is interesting that the behaviour of the duo after the sighting is not unusual in that neither could relax after what they had seen and were in fear of something else happening. I have heard the same thing from people who have observed "UFOs" close to -they are naturally nervous that something might happen as they may have seen something they were not supposed to.

Note also that the sighting was in 1980 and there had been similarly reported tall entities in silver outfits that went unpublicised.

There is no suggestion that these were 'ghosts' -I can't think of any reports of 7 feet (2.1 meters) tall ghosts.  There is also the question of why Mary saw several yet Paul saw only one figure.  It is possible that he only glimpsed one and that was enough -again, this is something noted in other shock situations -a person might just focus on one and state he/she saw one person in a criminal robbery yet 2-3 others report up to four gang members.

There is no indication of a time lapse as I called these reports before the term "missing time" became popular.

So what can we infer from this report?  One person we could explain using any number of things. It is impossible to say Mary hallucinated and said nothing but that her hallucination caused Paul to hallucinate. Oh -owls? Not likely -not even luminous ones!

This is a perfect example of a one off sighting -of something "that happened and then you get on with your life":even if the memory sticks with you.

A pity there was no witness drawing of what was seen.

Haunted Skies is a highly recommended series well worth investing in

"So what would you do if you encountered a landed UFO?"

I remember that at school my class was asked a question and that was "What would you say if you saw a ghost?" Really that should have been phrased as "What would you say to a ghost if you met one?" since that was what was being asked.

It was a topic used to excite the imagination and make you think.  Would you be allowed to use this topic in a modern school setting?  No idea.

I suppose that it depends on whether you believe that the spirits of dead people can appear after death.  I for one do not. I would like to but as my late mother kept saying "What you want and what you get are two different things!"

There is a chapter in my book, Some Things Strange and Sinister titled de occultis non judicat ecclesia which translates from Latin as the Church has not yet decided on the matter of ghosts -though "Non tamen in ecclesia constituit super manes" says the same thing really. Well, if after 2000 years the organised churches with histories of ghosts of bishops and others cannot decide who can?

The organisation of investigation into the paranormal that began during the Victorian era soon showed why things are a mess.  Anyone coming up with results was called a fool or charlatan.  "A" had his followers and "B" had theirs and if you didn't belong to either...you had a problem.

Today "ghost hunting" is fake entertainment, definitely a LOT of charlatans and cosplaying. There has not been one iota of solid evidence --garbled noises on a digital recorder are just that.  There is no recorded message along the lines of "My name is Bert Higgins and I lived at 142 Adalia Rd and King George was on the throne".

The obvious, logical quezstion is that if we are not getting any real evidence of "spirits of the dead" then WHAT are we dealing with? Psychology can answer some of this question but there are cases where any right minded investigator-researcher  should have realised they need to look into other areas.

Of course, apart from in entertainment and cosplay fantasy no one ever gets to stand around and talk to a 'ghost'. Certainly ask their name and if they lived where they are encountered and how they died but these things are so fleeting. But we are not hear to talk ghosts -my mother always said that she had no problem living next to the Arnos Vale Cemetery in Bristol "I'm not worried about ghosts -they won't hurt you.  Its living people you have to watch out for!"

And throughout my life I have to say that I have seen poltergeist type phenomena. I have seen, quite clearly, odd figures -others had encountered but not told me about! Again, I do not believe this the activity of the dead.  Apart from one particular location where I saw nothing but got hit by a wave of fear -even then I looked around and walked back up the steps quickly -even if I was walking backward. I said "That's a weird stairway" and was then told that the lady of the house would not go down there alone and even her  husband had felt the fear (though he never called it that as he was being all manly). I was not even investigating on this occasion but visiting someone.

The main thing is that you must not panic. Grit your teeth and move away from a situation but screaming and running away -never.

When it comes to the field of UFOs I entered it as a bright eyed and bushy-tailed novice who had read all the books and  as I got more involved I realised that, yes, authors did spin yarns (lie) and sensationalise. I found that the much mentioned "high scientific standard of UFO research" did not exist. Petty arguments, name calling and even ufologists outrightly hoaxing other ufologists was quite common.

On the practical side I have observed, in good conditions -and quite clear- light phenomena on about 6 occasions between 1977-1985 and one three occasions at close quarters. I watched the times of the observations and closely observed what I was seeing. Only afterwards did I make notes. Someone pointed out that it was different now as with mobile (cell) phones you can take footage. I pointed out that I do not carry a phone with me!

What I realised -after intense research- by 1980 was that, excluding ball lightning and pizoelectric phenomena, there was a data base showing another phenomenon that I termed UNP -Uninvestigated (by Science) Natural Phenomenon. I also realised from my personal observations that these phenomena contained a large amount of energy which could, potentially, be dangerous at close quarter and might leave behind enough energy (let's call it that) at a "landing site" that exposure could have harmful effects -I think I am a prime example of going into these areas too often (but more of that another time).

However much I would like to see some evidence of an extraterrestrial presence on Earth in the shape of a solid, constructed object (UFOB) I never have.

When I first began recording any and every reported encounter back in 1974 I had what I call "The Common Encounter Dream" or CED. In this I found myself in an isolated location out in the countryside -a small brick building with a window.  Out of this window I saw a landed flying saucer and moving about where a number entities and I realised that they were getting closer.  The dream ended. Obviously, psychologically, if you are reading and processing a huge number of reports then  sooner or later it will burst into your dreams.

In 1977 another person offered to help in the work -that would have made two of us in the UK!- and so he also began processing the reports. One evening this person looked at me and said@ "I had the weirdest dream about this stuff last night!" I asked him about it and he was basically describing my own dream. I found other people reading the material had similar.

Today, of course after Hopkins and Jacobs, someone will shout "suppressed abduction experience!" No. Not many people talk about this because it is seen as mundane and is common and you will hear people mention it. I knew someone who used to work at the old Fry's chocolate factory in Bristol:all day long watching and sorting chocolates and quality checking them. He told me: "For a week I just had this dream of endless sweets and chocolates going past on a conveyer belt -I was told everyone gets that when they first start". 

I once work for Frost and Reed Print makers in Bristol and the routine was to roll a print, package it and then box it. After I first started doing this work I had the dream of endlessly rolling prints, packaging them and then boxing them. The fellow who started at the same time as me related the same dream.  There are many such examples so why not the CED?

In UFO Contact? I noted cases in which people calling themselves UFO 'investigators' ran when an object landed in a nearby area.  I have heard this kind of thing over and over again.  When myself and late colleague Franklyn Davin-Wilson ran up to the copse at Cradle Hill where a moving light was seen some 30 or so sky watchers screamed at us to come back. WHY were they there sky-watching for the "space brothers" and then panicking at what the "space brothers" might do?

Charlatans out to make money from turning the subject into a jokey entertainment I do not expect to do anything seriously. I have seen LITS (Lights In The Sky) reports take up ufologists time -sometimes weeks. All over a small, moving light in the sky seen at a great distance. But multiple witness CE3K (Close Encounters of the Third Kind) relegated to the "gather dust" files.  Ufologists dismissing CE3K reports is odd because the question is then -who is piloting these "craft" they claim people see?

"Truth seekers" seems to onl;y go so far as press and media attention but not in real life.

There is a question I always think about and that is what if the entities encountered are non biological -androids or whatever used for the task involved? A number of cases involving 'robots' that I looked into were imaginary in one form or another which was a little disappointing. Ufologists have often attempted to explain away unusual actions by entities in certain cases as possibly indicating "robots" of some kind.

The major problem is, of course, that no one has actually met or studied an extraterrestrial at first hand so we have to go by what a witness/percipient reports and that is tainted by their own mindset or beliefs. Extraterrestrials may not have the same interpersonal reactions as humans do -they would be from a totally alien civilisation after all. "They behave  very coldly" and "They seemed indifferent" are phrases you will often hear. The other thing you will hear often is that there was a voice stating "You will not be harmed". In the latter instance this seems to be trying to let a percipient know that there is no intention of doing any permanent harm and calming them.

I was once asked what I would do if I was in a car on a lonely country road and a UFO landed yards in front of me?  Firstly, I would be surprised since I do not own a car nor do I drive! But joking aside it has to be defined what this "UFO" is? If it is UNP then I would stay in the said car until it moved off -collisions with this phenomenon are recorded and can result in some vehicle or personal injury. If I see ball lightning float past me am I going to grab it?  No.

If we see the supposed "UFO" as looking for all the world(s) like a constructed craft then things change.  No one can really say how they would react in a given situation but after 40 plus years opf thinking about this I decided long ago what I would do -presuming that I was not paralysed by some strange force.

I would get out of the car and move slowly toward the said "UFO". In past cases entities are reported to have 'fired' beams of light in front of witnesses as if to warn them to keep a safe distance.  In other cases witnesses have been waved back. My assumption would be that either this was an unplanned landing and I had been in the wrong place at the right time or that this was a deliberate landing with the intention of intercepting a human. Me.

You have to see this as being similar to encountering a landed helicopter or other aircraft.  It is a means of travel even if it is "not from here". If you approached a landed helicopter then you have no idea what the crew will do or be thinking.  You have to assume the crew will be friendly.  Likewise with any landed UFOB you would have to assume that they are not hostile but, perhaps, carrying scientific work or surveys and do not really want any form of long term contact with humans -which is understandable.

Over the decades I have known people who have lost half their face during war, others who had plastic facial prosthetics after accidents and even badly scarred. So the idea of meeting someone/thing that does not look "normal" is not a problem. I never screamed or ran away from those people with facial scarring or prosthetics so why run away at a point where my work and research can finally be completed?

It has to be realised that we are talking hypothetically here and that from the point of my voluntarily exiting a car to being allowed to approach a landed object is just that.  What happens after is Unknown. The ideal situation would be to attempt to converse with any entity(ies) and learn what I could and observe.  It would be a very strange version of being approached by foreign tourists who speak little English but need information -and you usually find out more about them (again, I have had this experience more than a few times).

I know what I would like to do -rather like I know what I would ask a 'ghost' in a conversation- but exiting the car and walking toward the object might be all I could guarantee. Looking at past encounters when percipients have seen a landed object and entituies they have approached them -as I noted in UFO Contact?

Ufology has been misled by decades of myth taken as scientific fact.  No flying saucer crashed at Aurora, Texas in the 1800s. No craft crashed at Roswell, New Mexico.  There are not hundreds of ET space craft as well as ETs in official custody around the world.  There is no mass kidnapping of humans in their millions by little Greys...or reptilians..or whichever Jacobs has come up with now.

We need to study the reports of the past 60 years and where  ever possible speak to witnesses/percipients because of the inadequacies of ufology and learn what we can.

Will I ever get the opportunity to come across a landed craft from beyond Earth?  Sadly, I doubt it. However, I hope that if I ever did I would follow the plan!

I Will Let YOU Decide

Along with all the other current problems I was looking at this blog.

In the last three years there has been one comment -thousands of views and a lot of original notes stolen and used  other people as their own. To add insult to injury not one book has sold.

This all tells me there is no genuine interest in the subject matter. After all, people can contact me privately if they with but nothing.

I may as well delete the blog today because I know the response I'll get but....if there are no comments etc by Wednesday 18th September it is bye-bye.  Life is too short to waste

Just a Note

I just spent two hours writing a lengthy post as a follow up to the last one and my laptop then shifted to another page altogether.

Lengthy post lost.

Sadly, with a rapidly dying laptop and no book sales it seems pointless trying to even attempt lengthier posts.

If anyone wishes to contact me they should go to the AOP or AE CE3K face book pages and message me there.

Charles I. Halt (b. 1939) is a retired United States Air Force colonel and a former deputy base commander of RAF Bentwaters, near Woodbridge, Suffolk. After serving in Vietnam, Japan and Korea, he was assigned to Bentwaters as deputy commander. The Rendlesham Forest incident of late December 1980 occurred shortly afterwards, and he was an important witness to events on the second night of sightings.

Why do I mention this?

Look who has my book  -Charles I Halt

530 pages

illustrated with maps, photographs and more

A4 format

B&W

Paperback: List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/ufo-contact/paperback/product-23719040.html

Since 1947 it has been claimed that UFOs/flying saucers are evidence of aliens visiting the Earth.  Since the 1950s claims of encounters with landed craft and alien beings were talked about but not taken seriously.

In the 1960s the subject of UFO abduction was a "slow-burner" until the whole "Grey" abduction phenomenon and claims made by researchers such as Budd Hopkins, Prof. John Mack and Dr David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber.

But is there evidence to back up any of the claims -and what about those encountering Alien Entities but who were not abducted?

Are these people all hoaxers, psychotic or suffering from some other mental illness as some claim?

Are those people who were exposed by Ufologists against their wishes, people who wanted to report what happened and then just get back to their everyday lives -thrust into the media glare against their will?

And if US authorities were so interested that in one case at least they broke into the home of two abductees and this was later proven -why?

Why did a hard core of these people never want publicity or to make money from what happened to them?

Above all, why did a major UFO landing incident take place on a US Inbterstate road in front of a large number of observers (all willing to talk to investigators) never get investigated? If it were not for a radio presenter interviewing and taking notes we would know nothing of the case -it would be labelled "insubstantial".

James and Coral Lorensen -the Scopolamine Kids; using a very notorious "truth drug" on alleged UFO witnesses and selling stories to newspapers.  An investigator (a veteran) showing a witness images of "aliens" encountered in other cases before any memories were retrieved.  Worst of all, the constant "pissing competition" and breaches of trust between UFO investigators.

2017 is the time to assess the past evidence and look at the faults within Ufology.

Not everyone is going to be happy -debunkers or ufologists.

Praised by Dr Mark Rodheiger of the Centre for UFO Studies and, below, John Hanson of the Haunted Skies Project and Colonel Charles Halt the officer involved in the Rendlesham incident.

 

Smaller format version:Pages 530 Binding Perfect Bound Paperback Interior Black ink &white  Weight 1.05kg  Size 18.9 x24.59cm£18.00
http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/high-strangeness/paperback/product-23822248.html

Second Book in the series

220 pages

A4

perfect bound

paperback

Fully illustrated with photographs and illustrations

List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days
http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooper-scharf/unidentified-identified/paperback/product-23799953.html

The follow up to the comprehensive book "UFO Contact?"

The Author spent 1974 to 2018 specializing in the investigation and research of Close Encounters of the Third Kind (CE3K) and alien entity cases; the former involving an Unidentified Flying Object and the latter, apparently, involving none.

Previously unreported cases as well as 'lost' cases are looked at as well as the possibility that some percients suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome after their encounters.

A must read for those with a serious interest in UFOs

Some of the contents:
 The Nottinghamshire UFO Crash of 1987…or 1988                                   
 The Llandrillo ‘Saucer’ and Berwyn Mountains ‘UFO’ Crash Retrieval 
 Strange Pennsylvania Entity Encounter                                                        
 UFO Abductees and Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome                             
 The UFO That Landed On A US Highway                                                   
 My Encounters With The Men In Black                                                        
 A Previously Un-noted Alien Entity Type                                                   

 Early 20th Century UK Close Encounters of the Third Kind                     
 Close Encounter with a Boggart                                                                      
 Some Odd and Unusual Cases                                                                       
 Rosa Lotti and the Happy Entities                                                                
 The Strange Case of the Woollaton Gnomes and the Mince-pie Martians
 What Happened on the Isle of Wight and at Felixstowe?                           
 The ‘Lost’ Belgian UFO Landing Case                                                      
 Strange Aliens from Outer Space?                                                             

 Encounter with Black Aliens and Landed UFO                                         

 Preliminary UK CE3K/Alien Entity Catalogue 


Third Book in the Series
These cover everything from UFOs and Close Encounters of the Third Kind to encounters with unidentified humanoid creatures, ghosts, poltergeists, mysterious and unidentified creatures at sea, on land as well as bizarre carcasses washed ashore.  Loch Ness, Sasquatch, previously thought lost photographs of a city in the sky and others.

And if you want to concentrate solely on alleged alien abductions or encounters then UFO Contact? (receiving some praise from the Centre for UFO Studies) and the follow up, Unidentified-Identified are the books you need

Contact! Encounters With Extra Terrestrial Entities?

Format  A4

370pp

Black & white

Profusely illustrated

£15.00 SPECIAL PRICE

The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) says that we may have to wait many thousands of years before any signals sent gets a response if they are detected.

The real SETI may already have established the there is alien life –and it has been visiting Earth for at least 70 years.

Once the mass of reports of 

Close Encounters of the Third Kind and entity encounters are sifted there remains a strong core of cases that defy logical explanation and suggest that these encounters have resulted in physiological effects and post traumatic stress.

Terry Hooper-Scharf of the CE3K/AE Project has led research into these reports for over 40 years and in this work takes a look at rare or obscure reports as well as cataloguing encounters from Germany and Portugal and focuses in on correlations in the reports and how the Dandenong (Kelly Cahill) encounter could be the best case ever reported.

Have the serious investigators and researchers looking into UFOs been unearthing better evidence of extra terrestrial life and contact with humans than established SETI ?

"Our investigators are all scientifically based..."

I have, for several months now, been trying to find UFO 'investigators' in the United States (particularly in Mississippi) but it seems that none are interested in re-opening and looking into old cases that have barely been looked at.

There was a peak of initial interest from two who asked "Is this for a TV show as I'm sure I could make time?"  On the response "No TV show" was involved....interest was lost.

I am sorry to say that this seems to prove that there is no real interest in scientific study or investigation amongst ufologists.  This is the very reason why persons in more established sciences (people in glass houses should not throw sticks) can simply dismiss "ufology".

The folder I am holding in the photograph is far from complete a catalogue but covers reports from the United States from 1971-1974 which is a period that saw a surge of good reports that were either "investigated by newspaper clipping" or at a very low level.

After over four decades every time I hear a MUFON promoter or ufologist utter the words "Our investigators are all scientifically based and we gave data and investigate to the degree of police crime investigations" I now yell out "Bovine excrement!"  It is an utter and outright lie.

Face it, from 1947 onward all ufology has achieved is to isolate itself from science and authorities and to turn the investigation into a money maker for certain frauds.

"Flying saucer enthusiasts" NOT "Ufology" (and pretending it is a science)

Why this is The ONLY UFO Books You Will Ever Need

Charles I. Halt (b. 1939) is a retired United States Air Force colonel and a former deputy base commander of RAF Bentwaters, near Woodbridge, Suffolk. After serving in Vietnam, Japan and Korea, he was assigned to Bentwaters as deputy commander. The Rendlesham Forest incident of late December 1980 occurred shortly afterwards, and he was an important witness to events on the second night of sightings.

Why do I mention this?
Look who has my book  -Charles I Halt

530 pages

illustrated with maps, photographs and more

A4 format

B&W

Paperback: List Price:£20.00 £18.00 (excl. VAT) |You Save: 10%Prints in 3-5 business days http://www.lulu.com/shop/terry-hooperscharf/ufo-contact/paperback/product-23719040.html

Since 1947 it has been claimed that UFOs/flying saucers are evidence of aliens visiting the Earth.  Since the 1950s claims of encounters with landed craft and alien beings were talked about but not taken seriously.

In the 1960s the subject of UFO abduction was a "slow-burner" until the whole "Grey" abduction phenomenon and claims made by researchers such as Budd Hopkins, Prof. John Mack and Dr David Jacobs and Whitley Streiber.

But is there evidence to back up any of the claims -and what about those encountering Alien Entities but who were not abducted?

Are these people all hoaxers, psychotic or suffering from some other mental illness as some claim?

Are those people who were exposed by Ufologists against their wishes, people who wanted to report what happened and then just get back to their everyday lives -thrust into the media glare against their will?

And if US authorities were so interested that in one case at least they broke into the home of two abductees and this was later proven -why?

Why did a hard core of these people never want publicity or to make money from what happened to them?

Above all, why did a major UFO landing incident take place on a US Inbterstate road in front of a large number of observers (all willing to talk to investigators) never get investigated? If it were not for a radio presenter interviewing and taking notes we would know nothing of the case -it would be labelled "insubstantial".

James and Coral Lorensen -the Scopolamine Kids; using a very notorious "truth drug" on alleged UFO witnesses and selling stories to newspapers.  An investigator (a veteran) showing a witness images of "aliens" encountered in other cases before any memories were retrieved.  Worst of all, the constant "pissing competition" and breaches of trust between UFO investigators.

2017 is the time to assess the past evidence and look at the faults within Ufology.

Not everyone is going to be happy -debunkers or ufologists.

Praised by Dr Mark Rodheiger of the Centre for UFO Studies and, below, John Hanson of the Haunted Skies Project and Colonel Charles Halt the officer involved in the Rendlesham incident.