Total Pageviews

Tuesday 24 January 2023

John E. Mack -Not That Trustworthy It Seems



 I have been "quiet" here but as my posts generally receive 100% no feedback or comments so it's like posting to myself.

One thing I have been doing is looking at the last of the "Big Three" abduction researchers (Hopkins, Jacobs, Mack) John E. Mack.

I have always considered Mack to have been a professional and being independent and unbiased when it came to abduction cases.  Then I heard rumours. Rumours I took at first to be nothing more than jealous slander or debunkers at work. So I decided to look into Mack and his abduction research and methods.

With a deep breath I have to say that I believe that Mack was biased in that he did not investigate. He talked and listened to "experiencers"/ "abductees" and "Contactees"  and even in the case of known fakes such as Carlos Diaz, he declared that he believed them and their families because "why would they lie about this?"

Money.

I think Mack's work loses credibility when we see him interviewed and what he says. He was not outrightly faking like Hopkins. He was not making stuff up and losing the plot like Jacobs. Mack was gullible and not credible in that he could have researched someone like Diaz and seen how the Lorenzens at APRO tore his story apart -we even know that the UFO in one of his photos is a type of locally produced lamp. Mack did not know that? 

For me I think this destroys the last of the big three abduction researchers and that none of them have or had credibility -and a lot of people knew this before Hopkins died., Knew this before Mack died. No one bothered (in Ufology) to set the record straight back then or since because lies make money and Ufology is all about making money.

Yeah, I was a dumb ass and got taken in but Hopkins I got doubts about and even put questions to (ignored) and I did try to set the record straight with Jacobs but...oh boy.

And what do I always say? NEVER EVER trust a Ufologist

Wednesday 11 January 2023

Update 11 01 2023

I was asked why I have posted no updates. I do believe I explained that in a previous post but really there is not much to report. The photo below shows the CE3K/AE archives from a few months ago -now that space to the left is crammed full of folders.

And that was it.

Sadly, with no book sales to bring in money to continue the work everything has ground to a halt. Archive work like this does not get financial backing so when the pockets are empty things just stop.

Obviously with the AOP Journal and books not selling the idea of writing another book is far from something I want to do and Ufology is so far gone at the  moment I do not think it is interested in serious research just the latest fake UAP spin or Vallee created money-spinner. 

So that is your update, Mike.


Thursday 5 January 2023

The Brooklyn Bridge UFO | The Weirdest Story You'll Ever Hear A Brief Note


Are we re-writing Budd Hopkins' history now so that he was a kindly old gent who got taken advantage of? 

He KNEW Cortile was LYING and he KNEW she was faking evidence 

He was FAKING and "stacking the decks" when it came to alleged alien symbols and he and Jacobs knew exactly what they were doing. 

That makes him a fraud

Let's cut this bull-shit and tell the truth...unless of course you have not thoroughly researched your subject?

Are We Going to Let All of the Information Fade Away: Or Are We Going To Do Something About It?

 originally published in 2018 on the AOP Blog I would like to offer this page from Patrick Gross' Ufologie page.  It shows the results f...