From IFL https://www.iflscience.com/the-ariel-school-phenomenon-what-really-happened-when-68-children-witnessed-a-ufo-63873
The Ariel School Phenomenon: What Really Happened When 68 Children Witnessed A UFO?
On September 16, 1994, 62 students at the Ariel School in Ruwa, Zimbabwe, claimed to witness an unknown craft descend from the sky and land in a field nearby.
The incident, which would become known as the Ariel School Phenomenom in UFO circles, started out on a fairly normal day. At break time – while the teachers remained inside for a faculty meeting – some of the children claim to have seen a silvery disc land on a hill just out of bounds. The children reportedly ran to the edge of the school grounds to get a better look, with several claiming that they saw figures emerge from what they described as a craft.
The children described the event – which they reported as having lasted up to 15 minutes – to their teachers after the break had ended, to much (warranted) skepticism. However, when they talked to their parents that night, they had questions that were then asked of the faculty. With this prompting, and the intervention of a local UFO researcher, the headteacher of the school asked the children to draw what they had seen. They came back with pretty similar images of silvery, classic UFO-type crafts, sometimes complete with alien figures standing nearby.
"It looked like it was glinting in the trees. It looked like a disc. Like a round disc," one child witness told the BBC a few days after the incident. "I saw something silver on the ground amongst the trees. And a person in black," another said.
The story only gets more complicated from here, making it difficult to figure out what exactly went on.
The children were interviewed by local UFO researcher Cynthia Hind the day after the event. What Hind found curious was that the students – who had diverse backgrounds, though all from wealthy families as tuition was expensive – described similar features to the figures and UFO, despite interpreting the phenomenon in wildly different ways based on their own upbringing.
Some thought that the figures were Zvikwambo (spirits of humans, raised by magic) or tokoloshe (evil goblin creatures of Shona and Ndebele folklore). Hind believes these different interpretations, accompanied by similar drawings and descriptions, gave more credibility to the idea that the children had all seen a similar event.
She also believed that the kids would not have had access to media about UFOs which could have tainted their testimony or planted similar images in their imaginations, telling the TV show Sightings "a lot of these children don't go to the movies. They live in the country. Parents are farmers". The argument being that if they had not encountered these images before and then described something similar, it gives more credibility to their alien encounter being real.
Next came a Harvard professor of psychiatry John Mack to interview the children. Through testimony collected by Mack, a new narrative emerged. When talking to the professor – who had recently published a book on UFOs and was heavily invested in the topic – the children reported receiving telepathic messages from the "aliens", spreading an environmental message. Mack had also recently been investigated by Harvard for giving credence to the idea to patients who had "reported a ‘close encounter’ with an Extraterrestrial life form that this experience might well have been real".
Despite being one of the reasons why the Ariel School incident is so widely known, his interview technique was sloppy. Having arrived months after the incident, meaning children could consolidate their stories in their minds, it's likely he prompted the children (perhaps unconsciously) to recall these telepathic events. Hind, meanwhile, had interviewed the children in groups of four to six, making the similarity of story details somewhat less impressive.
Another problem with Hind's idea that the children did not know of typical depictions of aliens in media was that the country was in the middle of something of a UFO fever at the time. Two days previously, the Zenit-2 rocket from the Cosmos 2290 satellite launch had re-entered the atmosphere, causing a fireball in the sky. It wasn't known what the object was by some local residents, and ZBC Radio had been hit with numerous calls claiming to have seen UFOs. Hind herself had learned of the incident after talking to the station herself, after a call was made about the school.
More sensible explanations – not requiring you to accept that aliens flew here, made a vague message to some school children, and then flew off again – range from mass hysteria to a simple prank on behalf of the school children. One team, documenting cases of mass hysteria in Africa at around this time period, says we should be able to label this and similar incidents as mass hysteria without investigating too much further.
"Time should not be wasted in a fruitless search for environmental precipitants, which by reinforcing behavior may serve to prolong the episode," doctors wrote in the Malawi Medical Journal. "In other words, Mass hysteria should not be a diagnosis of exclusion, after all the physical, chemical and biological factors have been ruled out."
_____________________________________
Here is my problem with this case; There appears to have been no thorough investigation of the alleged landing site. That is a problem.
Cynthia Hind made the biggest investigation error. It is almost an amateur mistake to make and yet Hind was, supposedly, a thorough investigator. You do not get a group of observers together then ask them to describe what they saw/happened. You take each one, which is time consuming but if you are an investigator that is what it takes: time and patience. Talk to each person individually (with a guardian present obviously) and ask them to tell you what they saw and draw what they saw. You do that with each observer then assess the possibility of cross contamination with accounts and then look at the possibility of it being a true event or not.
John Mack I must admit has hit rock bottom in my own opinion. The Diaz contactee case in Mexico was proven a hoax fairly soon after it was reported yet Mack ignored all the previous investigations of the case or -worse still- simply had not bothered doing any research. He pronounced, on film, that Diaz appeared to be telling the truth and that was it. After all, why would Diaz and his family lie? (I presume Mack had not heard of money at that point).
Mack also went about his look into the incident in a slip-shod way and you can be a Believer or Non-Believer -your choice. Debunking with claims of "possible mass hysteria...but might not be mass hysteria" by persons who go by press and other reports but never actually talked to all of the observers can be put in the waste bin. Mass hysteria cannot be put forward without evidence.
It seems an interesting case but Ufologists (pardon the language) fecked it up badly by being very amateurish and not following a proper investigation procedure. Too many claims were made by both Hind and Mack but with nothing to back them up. Of course, it is far too late now as the kids have grown and developed their own diverse opinion.
Had this incident been dealt with properly then we might have a really good case and, I have had this said before, the documentary "seems to show that it was genuine". Well, as far as I understand it from interviews I have seen the film maker claims to be an "experiencer" which, as far as impartiality goes is a concrete boot stepping on a raw egg.
In these cases we must follow a rigorous procedure. This comes across as a possible slightly over exaggerated schoolyard UFO encounter (of which there are a good few) but could have been more.
No comments:
Post a Comment